IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2022i1p14-d1016049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The COVID-19 Risk Perception: A Qualitative Study among the Population in an Urban Setting in Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Fadima Yaya Bocoum

    (Département Biomédical et Santé Publique, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7047, Burkina Faso
    African Population Health Research Center, WARO, Dakar BP 3746, Senegal)

  • Kadidiatou Kadio

    (Département Biomédical et Santé Publique, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7047, Burkina Faso
    Pilot African Postgraduate Academy (PAPA), Goethe University Frankfurt, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Alice Bila

    (Département Biomédical et Santé Publique, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7047, Burkina Faso)

  • Koiné Maxime Drabo

    (Département Biomédical et Santé Publique, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7047, Burkina Faso)

  • Seni Kouanda

    (Département Biomédical et Santé Publique, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7047, Burkina Faso)

Abstract

Background: The population’s adherence to public health recommendations depends on many individual and collective cultural, socioeconomic, institutional, and environmental factors and the perception of the risks involved. This study aimed to describe and analyze the perception of risk related to coronavirus in the general population. Methods: A qualitative, exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted in Ouagadougou, the capital city of Burkina Faso. It involved the general population (youth and adults, men and women, traditional practitioners, religious leaders, and opinion leaders). The data were analyzed using the thematic analysis method. Results: Respondents perceived COVID-19 as deadly, dangerous, and highly contagious. It emerged that respondents perceived themselves to be at risk of being infected by the virus. This risk exposure is linked to several factors. These include the dangerousness of the disease contaminated by direct contact, the feeling of vulnerability linked to working conditions (traders, exposing themselves and others to the disease), status (elderly, and sick,), gender (mobility of men compared to women), and the risk relationship (the individual perceived as being a potential danger to his family/relatives). Vulnerability depended on the immune status of the people (elderly people, pregnant women, and people with chronic diseases), working conditions (shopkeepers, and traders), and also socioeconomic categories (wealthy people). Conclusion: Policymakers and actors in the response to COVID-19 should develop communication strategies to better address ongoing challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Fadima Yaya Bocoum & Kadidiatou Kadio & Alice Bila & Koiné Maxime Drabo & Seni Kouanda, 2022. "The COVID-19 Risk Perception: A Qualitative Study among the Population in an Urban Setting in Burkina Faso," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:14-:d:1016049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/1/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/1/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:14-:d:1016049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.