IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i6p104-d566893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privacy Intrusiveness in Financial-Banking Fraud Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Larisa Găbudeanu

    (Faculty of Law, Babes-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Iulia Brici

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babes-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Codruța Mare

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration and the Interdisciplinary Centre for Data Science, Babes-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ioan Cosmin Mihai

    (Police Faculty, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Police Academy, 014031 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mircea Constantin Șcheau

    (European Research Institute, Babes-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Faculty of Automatics, Computer Science & Electronics, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

Specialty literature and solutions in the market have been focusing in the last decade on collecting and aggregating significant amounts of data about transactions (and user behavior) and on refining the algorithms used to identify fraud. At the same time, legislation in the European Union has been adopted in the same direction (e.g., PSD2) in order to impose obligations on stakeholders to identify fraud. However, on the one hand, the legislation provides a high-level description of this legal obligation, and on the other hand, the solutions in the market are diversifying in terms of data collected and, especially, attempts to aggregate data in order to generate more accurate results. This leads to an issue that has not been analyzed yet deeply in specialty literature or by legislators, respectively, the privacy concerns in case of profile building and aggregation of data for fraud identification purposes and responsibility of stakeholders in the identification of frauds in the context of their obligations under data protection legislation. This article comes as a building block in this direction of research, as it contains (i) an analysis of existing fraud detection methods and approaches, together with their impact from a data protection legislation perspective and (ii) an analysis of respondents’ views toward privacy in case of fraud identification in transactions based on a questionnaire in this respect having 425 respondents. Consequently, this article assists in bridging the gap between data protection legislation and implementation of fraud detection obligations under the law, as it provides recommendations for compliance with the latter legal obligation while also complying with data protection aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Larisa Găbudeanu & Iulia Brici & Codruța Mare & Ioan Cosmin Mihai & Mircea Constantin Șcheau, 2021. "Privacy Intrusiveness in Financial-Banking Fraud Detection," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:104-:d:566893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/6/104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/6/104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Vijay Victor & Chin Lay Gan & Sebastian Kot, 2019. "Electronic commerce for home-based businesses in emerging and developed economy," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(4), pages 463-483, December.
    2. Ronia Hawash & Guenter Lang, 2020. "Does the digital gap matter? Estimating the impact of ICT on productivity in developing countries," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(2), pages 189-209, June.
    3. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Chi Keung Marco Lau & Ender Demir, 2012. "Technology Transfer, Finance Channels, And Sme Performance: New Evidence From Developing Countries," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 57(03), pages 1-20.
    4. Edwards, Lilian & Veale, Michael, 2017. "Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for," LawArXiv 97upg, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liuchang Xu & Jie Wang & Dayu Xu & Liang Xu, 2022. "Integrating Individual Factors to Construct Recognition Models of Consumer Fraud Victimization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oznur Ozdamar & Eleftherios Giovanis & Sahizer Samuk, 2020. "State business relations and the dynamics of job flows in Egypt and Turkey," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(4), pages 519-558, December.
    2. Emre Bayamlıoğlu, 2022. "The right to contest automated decisions under the General Data Protection Regulation: Beyond the so‐called “right to explanation”," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1058-1078, October.
    3. Mazur Joanna, 2019. "Automated Decision-Making and the Precautionary Principle in EU Law," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 3-18, December.
    4. Daniela Sele & Marina Chugunova, 2023. "Putting a Human in the Loop: Increasing Uptake, but Decreasing Accuracy of Automated Decision-Making," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 438, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    5. Hayet Kerras & Susana Bautista & Danilo Santos Piñeros Perea & María Dolores de-Miguel Gómez, 2022. "Closing the Digital Gender Gap among Foreign University Students: The Challenges Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, September.
    6. Anna Aseeva, 2023. "Liable and Sustainable by Design: A Toolbox for a Regulatory Compliant and Sustainable Tech," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, December.
    7. König, Pascal D. & Wenzelburger, Georg, 2021. "The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector: Why it arises and how to address it," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Barry Quinn, 2023. "Explaining AI in Finance: Past, Present, Prospects," Papers 2306.02773, arXiv.org.
    9. Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius & Joost Poort, 2017. "Online Price Discrimination and EU Data Privacy Law," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 347-366, September.
    10. Vasiliki Koniakou, 2023. "From the “rush to ethics” to the “race for governance” in Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 71-102, February.
    11. Mehdi Barati & Bahareh Ansari, 2022. "Effects of algorithmic control on power asymmetry and inequality within organizations," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 525-544, December.
    12. Yang Liu & Yanlin Yang & Huihui Li & Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Digital Economy Development, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China’s Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Veale, Michael & Van Kleek, Max & Binns, Reuben, 2018. "Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making," SocArXiv 8kvf4, Center for Open Science.
    14. Ilya Ivaninskiy & Irina Ivashkovskaya, 2022. "Are blockchain-based digital transformation and ecosystem-based business models mutually reinforcing? The principal-agent conflict perspective," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 643-670, December.
    15. Shuaitao Jiao & Qiubi Sun, 2021. "Digital Economic Development and Its Impact on Econimic Growth in China: Research Based on the Prespective of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Koefer, Franziska & Lemken, Ivo & Pauls, Jan, 2023. "Fairness in algorithmic decision systems: A microfinance perspective," EIF Working Paper Series 2023/88, European Investment Fund (EIF).
    17. Yi Yong Lee & Chin Lay Gan, 2020. "Applications of SOR and para-social interactions (PSI) towards impulse buying: the Malaysian perspective," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 85-98, June.
    18. Shuangcheng Luo & Yangli Yuan, 2023. "The Path to Low Carbon: The Impact of Network Infrastructure Construction on Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Andrew E. Hansen-Addy & Davide M. Parrilli & Ishmael Tingbani, 2024. "The impact of trade facilitation on African SMEs’ performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 105-131, January.
    20. Emmanuel H. Yindi & Immaculate Maumoh & Prisillah L. Mahavile, 2021. "Exploring the role of Awareness, Government Policy, and Infrastructure in adapting B2C E-Commerce to East African Countries," Papers 2102.11729, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:104-:d:566893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.