IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v11y2022i7p63-d860686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fleur de sel : How Does a Pinch of Suitable Choice Practices Value This Sustainable Natural Resource?

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Ramos

    (CinTurs-Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-Being, University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

Abstract

As mechanized processes developed, small producers of traditional sea salt ceased to be competitive. However, when the valuable salt flower (a.k.a. fleur de sel , flower of salt) market appeared, it gave new breath to the activity of traditional salt pan production. Salt flower sensitivity and delicateness became a part of modern food habits. Its crystals present some grain differentiation and these can fulfill diversified consumer tastes. In cooking art, a regular fine flower of salt can be used to finish dishes, whereas a longer and thin grain known as ‘scale’ (a.k.a. écaille de fleur de sel in French) can be used for a more gourmet-like palate. Here a suitable method is presented to sort and grade flower of salt to satisfy different palates. The method of salt flower selection is based on four main characteristics, which should be considered: cleansing, moisture, color, and size. It is the grain size that contributes most to demand allocation. The results show that what is produced (supply) and the demand from customers do not exactly match. The tiniest types of salt flower are usually completely absorbed by the market, whereas the largest types have no market at all.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Ramos, 2022. "Fleur de sel : How Does a Pinch of Suitable Choice Practices Value This Sustainable Natural Resource?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:63-:d:860686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/7/63/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/7/63/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bjørndal, Trond & Lappo, Alena & Ramos, Jorge, 2015. "An economic analysis of the Portuguese fisheries sector 1960–2011," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 21-30.
    2. Sanjeev Agarwal & Michael J. Barone, 2005. "Emerging Issues for Geographical Indication Branding Strategies," Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center (MATRIC) Publications (archive only) 05-mrp9, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    3. Sanjeev Agarwal & Michael J. Barone, 2005. "Emerging Issues for Geographical Indication Branding Strategies," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 05-mrp9, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guilherme Silva Fracarolli, 2021. "Mapping Online Geographical Indication: Agrifood Products on E-Commerce Shelves of Mercosur and the European Union," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Saak, Alexander E., 2010. "Country of Origin Labeling with Horizontal Differentiation and Cost Variability," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61328, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Pedro Valadas Monteiro, 2016. "Managing Scarce Resources and Sensitive Ecosystems: Assessing the Role of CFP in the Development of Portuguese Fisheries," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-30, December.
    4. Gordon, Daniel V., 2018. "Country of origin growth modelling for imported salted & dried (Klippfisk) products to Brazil," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 31-43.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:63-:d:860686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.