IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v11y2022i1p4-d719946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Downstream Development Strategy of Oil Companies: The Case of Rosneft

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana Marinina

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Anna Tsvetkova

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Yurii Vasilev

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Nadejda Komendantova

    (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria)

  • Anna Parfenova

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

The relevance of this study is due to the low rate of development of the downstream sectors of Russian oil companies. Against a background of the sale of significant volumes of oil and gas raw materials, Russia lags behind world leaders in the production and consumption of petrochemical and chemical products, with their share in the gross domestic product of the country being only 1.1%. Connected to this is the issue of substantiating strategies of development for the downstream sectors of Russian oil companies, which requires detailed research. In this light, it is necessary to take into account current trends in the worldwide demand on petroleum products and also the opportunities and competitive advantages of Russian oil and gas companies in the creation and development of refineries with a consideration of modern technological, environmental, social and market criteria. The paper tests hypotheses about modernisation as a process of increasing efficiency in the development of the industry as a whole. The results of the study show that the planned pace of development in the industry by means of modernisation proves to be insufficient and requires additional investments in innovative development and new construction. The value of the research lies in the modelling of modernisation strategy options by the example of a large oil company, the estimation of results by the criteria of world average indices of technological efficiency of production and the analysis of these results by state indicators of branch development. The theoretical significance of the research lies in the possibility of using this research approach as an analogue.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana Marinina & Anna Tsvetkova & Yurii Vasilev & Nadejda Komendantova & Anna Parfenova, 2022. "Evaluating the Downstream Development Strategy of Oil Companies: The Case of Rosneft," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:4-:d:719946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatyana Ponomarenko & Marina Nevskaya & Oksana Marinina, 2020. "An Assessment of the Applicability of Sustainability Measurement Tools to Resource-Based Economies of the Commonwealth of Independent States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Yurii Vasilev & Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Anna Tsvetkova & Nadejda Komendantova, 2021. "Promoting Public Awareness of Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies in the Russian Federation: A System of Educational Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Natalia Vasilenko & Marck Khaykin & Natalia Kirsanova & Arunas Lapinskas & Larisa Makhova, 2020. "Issues for Development of Economic System for Subsurface Resource Management in Russia through Lens of Economic Process Servitization," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 44-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lijuan Zhang & Tatyana Ponomarenko, 2023. "Directions for Sustainable Development of China’s Coal Industry in the Post-Epidemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    2. Yury Valeryevich Ilyushin & Ekaterina Ivanovna Kapostey, 2023. "Developing a Comprehensive Mathematical Model for Aluminium Production in a Soderberg Electrolyser," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Pavel Tsiglianu & Natalia Romasheva & Artem Nenko, 2023. "Conceptual Management Framework for Oil and Gas Engineering Project Implementation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Marina A. Nevskaya & Semen M. Raikhlin & Victoriya V. Vinogradova & Victor V. Belyaev & Mark M. Khaikin, 2023. "A Study of Factors Affecting National Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Larisa Vazhenina & Elena Magaril & Igor Mayburov, 2022. "Resource Conservation as the Main Factor in Increasing the Resource Efficiency of Russian Gas Companies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenxiao Chu & Maria Vicidomini & Francesco Calise & Neven Duić & Poul Alborg Østergaard & Qiuwang Wang & Maria da Graça Carvalho, 2022. "Recent Advances in Low-Carbon and Sustainable, Efficient Technology: Strategies and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Syeda Tayyaba Ijaz & Sumayya Chughtai, 2022. "The Impact of Financial, Economic and Environmental Factors on Energy Efficiency, Intensity, and Dependence: The Moderating Role of Governance and Institutional Quality," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 15-31, July.
    3. Tatyana Ponomarenko & Oksana Marinina & Marina Nevskaya & Kristina Kuryakova, 2021. "Developing Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methods for Oil and Gas Companies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Oksana Marinina & Natalia Kirsanova & Marina Nevskaya, 2022. "Circular Economy Models in Industry: Developing a Conceptual Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Emiliia Iakovleva & Margarita Belova & Amilcar Soares, 2020. "Specific Features of Mapping Large Discontinuous Faults by the Method of Electromagnetic Emission," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk & Grzegorz Wesołowski, 2021. "The Effect of Using Social Media in the Modern Marketing Communication on the Shaping an External Employer’s Image," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Oksana Marinina & Marina Nevskaya & Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Radosław Wolniak & Mikhail Marinin, 2021. "Recycling of Coal Fly Ash as an Example of an Efficient Circular Economy: A Stakeholder Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Kyriaki-Argyro Tsioptsia & Eleni Zafeiriou & Dimitrios Niklis & Nikolaos Sariannidis & Constantin Zopounidis, 2022. "The Corporate Economic Performance of Environmentally Eligible Firms Nexus Climate Change: An Empirical Research in a Bayesian VAR Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Natalia Romasheva & Diana Dmitrieva, 2021. "Energy Resources Exploitation in the Russian Arctic: Challenges and Prospects for the Sustainable Development of the Ecosystem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-31, December.
    10. Ilinova, Alina & Dmitrieva, Diana & Kraslawski, Andrzej, 2021. "Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on fertilizer companies: The role of competitive advantages," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. Amina Chanysheva & Pierre Kopp & Natalia Romasheva & Anni Nikulina, 2021. "Migration Attractiveness as a Factor in the Development of the Russian Arctic Mineral Resource Potential," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, June.
    12. Dmitry Radoushinsky & Kirill Gogolinskiy & Yousef Dellal & Ivan Sytko & Abhishek Joshi, 2023. "Actual Quality Changes in Natural Resource and Gas Grid Use in Prospective Hydrogen Technology Roll-Out in the World and Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-31, October.
    13. Elena Katysheva, 2023. "Analysis of the Interconnected Development Potential of the Oil, Gas and Transport Industries in the Russian Arctic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Ekaterina Golovina & Svetlana Pasternak & Pavel Tsiglianu & Nikolay Tselischev, 2021. "Sustainable Management of Transboundary Groundwater Resources: Past and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Szymon Szewrański & Jan K. Kazak, 2020. "Socio-Environmental Vulnerability Assessment for Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-5, September.
    16. Oksana Marinina & Anna Nechitailo & Gennady Stroykov & Anna Tsvetkova & Ekaterina Reshneva & Liudmila Turovskaya, 2023. "Technical and Economic Assessment of Energy Efficiency of Electrification of Hydrocarbon Production Facilities in Underdeveloped Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    17. Ellie Martus & Stephen Fortescue, 2022. "Russian coal in a changing climate: risks and opportunities for industry and government," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Yanbin Li & Yanting Sun & Yulin Kang & Feng Zhang & Junjie Zhang, 2023. "An Optimal Site Selection Framework for Near-Zero Carbon Emission Power Plants Based on Multiple Stakeholders," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-26, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:4-:d:719946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.