IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v12y2024i1p7-d1352372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should I Buy the Current Narrative about Predatory Journals? Facts and Insights from the Brazilian Scenario

Author

Listed:
  • Cicero Cena

    (SISFOTON-Laboratório de Óptica e Fotônica, UFMS-Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil)

  • Daniel A. Gonçalves

    (Faculty of Exact Science and Technology, UFGD-Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados 79804-970, MS, Brazil)

  • Giuseppe A. Câmara

    (LEMA, Institute of Chemistry, UFMS-Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil)

Abstract

The burgeoning landscape of scientific communication, marked by an explosive surge in published articles, journals, and specialized publishers, prompts a critical examination of prevailing assumptions. This article advocates a dispassionate and meticulous analysis to avoid policy decisions grounded in anecdotal evidence or superficial arguments. The discourse surrounding so-called predatory journals has been a focal point within the academic community, with concerns ranging from alleged lack of peer review rigor to exorbitant publication fees. While the consensus often leans towards avoiding such journals, this article challenges the prevailing narrative. It calls for a more nuanced understanding of what constitutes predatory practices and underscores the importance of skeptical inquiry within our daily academic activities. The authors aim to dispel misconceptions and foster a more informed dialogue by scrutinizing APCs, impact factors, and retractions. Furthermore, the authors delve into the evolving landscape of scientific publishing, addressing the generational shifts and emerging trends that challenge traditional notions of prestige and impact. In conclusion, this article serves as a call to action for the scientific community to engage in a comprehensive and nuanced debate on the complex issues surrounding scientific publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Cicero Cena & Daniel A. Gonçalves & Giuseppe A. Câmara, 2024. "Should I Buy the Current Narrative about Predatory Journals? Facts and Insights from the Brazilian Scenario," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-5, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:7-:d:1352372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/12/1/7/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/12/1/7/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:7-:d:1352372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.