IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v11y2023i3p41-d1211926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Open Scholarship More Equitable and Inclusive

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Longley Arthur

    (School of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Mt Lawley, Perth, WA 6050, Australia)

  • Lydia Hearn

    (School of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Mt Lawley, Perth, WA 6050, Australia)

  • John C. Ryan

    (School of Arts and Social Sciences, Southern Cross University, East Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia)

  • Nirmala Menon

    (School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore 453552, India)

  • Langa Khumalo

    (South African Centre for Digital Language Resources (SADiLaR), North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa)

Abstract

Democratizing access to information is an enabler for our digital future. It can transform how knowledge is created, preserved, and shared, and strengthen the connection between academics and the communities they serve. Yet, open scholarship is influenced by history and politics. This article explores the foundations underlying open scholarship as a quest for more just, equitable, and inclusive societies. It analyzes the origins of the open scholarship movement and explores how systemic factors have impacted equality and equity of knowledge access and production according to location, nationality, race, age, gender, and socio-economic circumstances. It highlights how the privileges of the global North permeate academic and technical standards, norms, and infrastructures. It also reviews how the collective design of more open and collaborative networks can engage a richer diversity of communities, enabling greater social inclusion, and presents key examples. By fostering dialogue with multiple stakeholders, more effective avenues for knowledge production and representation can be built based on approaches that are accessible, participatory, interactive, ethical, and transparent, and that reach a far broader public. This expansive vision of open science will lead to a more unified knowledge economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Longley Arthur & Lydia Hearn & John C. Ryan & Nirmala Menon & Langa Khumalo, 2023. "Making Open Scholarship More Equitable and Inclusive," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:41-:d:1211926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/3/41/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/3/41/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:41-:d:1211926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.