IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmerit/v4y2024i1p3-50d1334555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace Leadership Development Practices: An Environmental Scan

Author

Listed:
  • Roslyn Cameron

    (Centre for Organisational Change & Agility (COCA), Torrens University Australia, Wakefield Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Christine Edwards

    (Centre for Organisational Change & Agility (COCA), Torrens University Australia, Wakefield Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Gregory Harper

    (Business & Hospitality, Torrens University Australia, Brisbane Campus, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia)

Abstract

Effective workplace leadership development programs are considered critical to organizational adaptive capacity and sustainability. The purpose of this exploratory study is to conduct an environmental scan of contemporary practices and approaches to leadership and management development programs in Australian workplaces. An online survey was distributed to a sample of Australian human resource professionals given the field’s strong practitioner orientation. The survey sample includes members of the Australian Human Resources Institute (AHRI), the professional body for human resource professionals and practitioners in Australia. The findings indicate a substantial majority of the current practice is not informed by evidence-based theory or practice. The most commonly used model is 70:20:10, which lacks a coherent evidence base and has been widely criticized for that reason. The findings point to the frequent application of bespoke leadership frameworks and significant theory–practice gaps. While organizations cite “ensuring delivery of business results”, as the main driver for instigating leadership development programs, with support from top management being crucial to the effectiveness and success of leadership development programs/interventions, evaluation and measurement of impact and return on investment remains problematic. Based on these insights, we present a future research agenda for monitoring and evaluating leadership development programs that will build a stronger theoretical foundation to inform evidence-based practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Roslyn Cameron & Christine Edwards & Gregory Harper, 2024. "Workplace Leadership Development Practices: An Environmental Scan," Merits, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:4:y:2024:i:1:p:3-50:d:1334555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/4/1/3/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/4/1/3/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:4:y:2024:i:1:p:3-50:d:1334555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.