IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmerit/v2y2022i4p28-407d967220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing Workplace Training for Generational Differences: Does It Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Zane L. Berge

    (Department of Education, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA)

Abstract

There is little to no empirical evidence that designing instruction to match individual learning styles increases learning. Similarly, the same is true when people are grouped into “generations”. If generational differences exist, the size of their effect is small and does not affect the effectiveness of training. Still, educators and trainers overwhelmingly think differentiated design based on learning styles and generational differences cause students to learn more. Why? I argue that there are other outcomes to instruction besides effectiveness . If instruction matches an individual’s preferences, content and skills can often be learned more efficiently and certainly appeal more to the learner than if it does not match their preferences. It is argued that both efficiency and appeal of instruction are important outcomes for students even when effectiveness is not significantly changed by matching the instructional approach to the learner’s preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Zane L. Berge, 2022. "Designing Workplace Training for Generational Differences: Does It Matter?," Merits, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-8, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:2:y:2022:i:4:p:28-407:d:967220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/2/4/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/2/4/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:2:y:2022:i:4:p:28-407:d:967220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.