IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i22p2975-d684775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional Development in Mathematics Education—Evaluation of a MOOC on Outdoor Mathematics

Author

Listed:
  • Eugenia Taranto

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy)

  • Simone Jablonski

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Education, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Tomas Recio

    (Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Christian Mercat

    (Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UR 4148 S2HEP, F-69622 Lyon, France)

  • Elisabete Cunha

    (Escola Superior de Educação, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4901-908 Viana do Castelo, Portugal)

  • Claudia Lázaro

    (Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computing, University de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain)

  • Matthias Ludwig

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Education, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Maria Flavia Mammana

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy)

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the impact of a massive open online course (MOOC) in the context of outdoor mathematics on the participating teachers’ professional development. We firstly introduce the theoretical background on outdoor mathematics, focusing on math trails with the digital tool MathCityMap and professional development to be accomplished using MOOCs. By taking into account the MOOC “Task Design for Math Trails”, with 93 finalists, we analyze the learning progress of 19 selected case studies from different nations and learning levels by taking into account their answers in a pre- and post-questionnaire and their posts on a specific communication message board, with a special focus on the MOOC’s topics’ task design for outdoor mathematics and the digital tool MathCityMap. The analysis is performed using different quantitative and qualitative approaches. The results show that the teachers studied have benefited from professional development, which is evident in the expansion/evolution of their knowledge from a content, pedagogical, and technological perspective. Finally, we formulate consequences for professional development in STEM education, and conclude the paper with limitations to be drawn and a perspective for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugenia Taranto & Simone Jablonski & Tomas Recio & Christian Mercat & Elisabete Cunha & Claudia Lázaro & Matthias Ludwig & Maria Flavia Mammana, 2021. "Professional Development in Mathematics Education—Evaluation of a MOOC on Outdoor Mathematics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-30, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:22:p:2975-:d:684775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/22/2975/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/22/2975/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaona Xia & Wanxue Qi, 2024. "Driving STEM learning effectiveness: dropout prediction and intervention in MOOCs based on one novel behavioral data analysis approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Angel C. Herrero & Tomás Recio & Piedad Tolmos & M. Pilar Vélez, 2023. "From the Steam Engine to STEAM Education: An Experience with Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Simon Barlovits & Amélia Caldeira & Georgios Fesakis & Simone Jablonski & Despoina Koutsomanoli Filippaki & Claudia Lázaro & Matthias Ludwig & Maria Flavia Mammana & Ana Moura & Deng-Xin Ken Oehler & , 2022. "Adaptive, Synchronous, and Mobile Online Education: Developing the ASYMPTOTE Learning Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-36, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:22:p:2975-:d:684775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.