IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v13y2024i1p9-d1339526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resh(AI)ping Good Administration: Addressing the Mass Effects of Public Sector Digitalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Sanchez-Graells

    (Law School, Faculty of Arts, Law and Social Sciences, University of Bristol, Clifton Campus, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK)

Abstract

Public sector digitalisation is transforming public governance at an accelerating rate. Digitalisation is outpacing the evolution of the legal framework. Despite several strands of international efforts to adjust good administration guarantees to new modes of digital public governance, progress has so far been slow and tepid. The increasing automation of decision-making processes puts significant pressure on traditional good administration guarantees, jeopardises individual due process rights, and risks eroding public trust. Automated decision-making has, so far, attracted the bulk of scholarly attention, especially in the European context. However, most analyses seek to reconcile existing duties towards individuals under the right to good administration with the challenges arising from digitalisation. Taking a critical and technology-centred doctrinal approach to developments under the law of the European Union and the Council of Europe, this paper goes beyond current debates to challenge the sufficiency of existing good administration duties. By stressing the mass effects that can derive from automated decision-making by the public sector, the paper advances the need to adapt good administration guarantees to a collective dimension through an extension and a broadening of the public sector’s good administration duties: that is, through an extended ex ante control of organisational risk-taking, and a broader ex post duty of automated redress. These legal modifications should be urgently implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Sanchez-Graells, 2024. "Resh(AI)ping Good Administration: Addressing the Mass Effects of Public Sector Digitalisation," Laws, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:9-:d:1339526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/13/1/9/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/13/1/9/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuziemski, Maciej & Misuraca, Gianluca, 2020. "AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Weidong & Zuo, Na & He, Wu & Li, Songtao & Yu, Lu, 2021. "Factors influencing the use of artificial intelligence in government: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Tan Yigitcanlar & Rashid Mehmood & Juan M. Corchado, 2021. "Green Artificial Intelligence: Towards an Efficient, Sustainable and Equitable Technology for Smart Cities and Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Vasiliki Koniakou, 2023. "From the “rush to ethics” to the “race for governance” in Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 71-102, February.
    4. Sini V. Pillai & Ranjith S. Kumar, 2021. "The role of data-driven artificial intelligence on COVID-19 disease management in public sphere: a review," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 48(4), pages 375-389, December.
    5. Shet, Sateesh V. & Pereira, Vijay, 2021. "Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Chih-Hao Yang & Yen-Yu Liu & Chia-Hsin Chiang & Ya-Wen Su, 2023. "National IoMT platform strategy portfolio decision model under the COVID-19 environment: based on the financial and non-financial value view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 1151-1179, September.
    7. Atabek Atabekov, 2023. "Public Functions Implementation by Artificial Intelligence: Current Practices and Prospects for Common Measures within Particular Periods across Continents and Regions," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Noha Diab & Nicoleta Isac & Cosmin Dobrin, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Jobs: The Impact of Pandemic on Governmental Organizations in Istanbul - Turkey," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(1), pages 46-64, March.
    9. David, Sofia & Zinica, Daniel & Bărbuță-Mișu, Nicoleta & Savga, Larisa & Virlanuta, Florina-Oana, 2024. "Public administration managers' and employees' perceptions of adaptability to change under “the future of work” paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Sergey A. Revyakin, 2022. "Personal privacy VS. public safety: A hybrid model of the use of smart city solutions in fighting the COVID‐19 pandemic in Moscow," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(5), pages 281-292, December.
    11. Lucia Vesnic‐Alujevic, 2021. "Imagining democratic societies of the future: Insights from a foresight study," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), March.
    12. Mora, Luca & Gerli, Paolo & Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2023. "Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Emma Dahlin, 2021. "Mind the gap! On the future of AI research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-4, December.
    14. Alkinoos Psarras & Theodoros Anagnostopoulos & Ioannis Salmon & Yannis Psaromiligkos & Lazaros Vryzidis, 2022. "A Change Management Approach with the Support of the Balanced Scorecard and the Utilization of Artificial Neural Networks," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen, 2021. "Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on public managers’ attitudes toward digital transformation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Rocco, Salvatore, 2022. "Implementing and managing Algorithmic Decision-Making in the public sector," SocArXiv ex93w, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:9-:d:1339526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.