IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v10y2021i4p86-d677487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Restorative Justice an Effective Approach in Responding to Children and Young People Who Sexually Harm?

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Mary Armstrong

    (School of Law, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 OLT, UK)

Abstract

In the UK, Australia, and further afield, restorative programmes have been developed as a response to the failure of the criminal justice system to give victims of sexual violence a voice in the legal process. The restorative justice literature has tended to focus on sexual offences perpetrated by adults and the importance of being victim centred. When it is a child or young person (CYP) who sexually harms, it poses a unique set of challenges for law and society and the restorative practitioner. This article explores the reasons why a different approach may be warranted given the perceived failure of conventional criminal justice in addressing the growing problem of child and adolescent harmful sexual behaviour (HSB) in Scotland. It discusses the difficulties with balancing the rights of the victim with the CYP who perpetrates the HSB and considers the challenges encountered by practitioners in the implementation and application of restorative programmes in HSB cases involving CYP. Although the evidence supports a growing need for a different approach, and restorative justice may offer just that, problems with net widening, the referral process, and resistance from other professionals and victim advocacy groups present real barriers. Consequently, restorative practitioners are likely to find practising in this area more challenging due to a lack of support and cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Mary Armstrong, 2021. "Is Restorative Justice an Effective Approach in Responding to Children and Young People Who Sexually Harm?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-9, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:86-:d:677487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/4/86/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/4/86/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan Hobson & Anamika Twyman-Ghoshal & Rebecca Banwell-Moore & Daniel P Ash, 2022. "Restorative Justice, Youth Violence, and Policing: A Review of the Evidence," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:86-:d:677487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.