IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i4p825-d1115774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Riverside Placemaking outside Big Cities—The Case Study of Three Polish Rivers

Author

Listed:
  • Dawid Soszyński

    (Department of Landscape Planning and Designing, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Konstantynów 1H, 20-708 Lublin, Poland)

  • Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek

    (Department of Grassland and Landscape Shaping, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Most placemaking activities have both tangible and intangible aspects. However, the most significant division line comes from the driving force behind the process, which can be either top-down formal actions or bottom-up informal ones. This article presents how placemaking works and what types of related actions dominate in rural areas, focusing on the riparian zones of three lowland rivers in Poland with a total length of 300 km. The main goal was to demonstrate the specificity of placemaking in riverfront areas outside large cities and to investigate the answers to the following questions: (1) How do public spaces emerge there? (2) Which entities are responsible for their creation, type, form, and location? To achieve these objectives, a detailed field inventory from the water level and interviews with creators, caretakers, and users of selected places were conducted. This research showed that informal placemaking is very common outside of cities and is also integrated into the creation of less numerous but more impressive public and private recreational areas. In terms of form, “Do It Yourself” (DIY) objects overwhelmingly dominate in all types of places. Both of these characteristics, informality and DIY, clearly indicate the specificity of rural riparian areas and the need to consider them in planning and strategic actions in areas outside large cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawid Soszyński & Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek, 2023. "Riverside Placemaking outside Big Cities—The Case Study of Three Polish Rivers," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:825-:d:1115774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/825/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/825/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rixt A. Bijker & Nora Mehnen & Frans J. Sijtsma & Michiel N. Daams, 2014. "Managing Urban Wellbeing in Rural Areas: The Potential Role of Online Communities to Improve the Financing and Governance of Highly Valued Nature Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Eckenwiler, L.A., 2016. "Defining ethical placemaking for place-based interventions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(11), pages 1944-1946.
    3. Meryl Braconnier & Cheryl E. Morse & Stephanie Hurley, 2022. "Using Photovisualizations to Gain Perspectives on River Conservation over Time," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Beau B. Beza, 2016. "The role of deliberative planning in translating best practice into good practice: from placeless-ness to placemaking," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 244-263, April.
    5. Gabriela Quintana Vigiola, 2022. "Understanding Place in Place-Based Planning: From Space- to People-Centred Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Matthew Carmona, 2014. "The Place-shaping Continuum: A Theory of Urban Design Process," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 2-36, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Armands Auzins & Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, 2021. "Values-Led Planning Approach in Spatial Development: A Methodology," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Shuyang Li & Fei Qu, 2022. "Preserving Authenticity in Urban Regeneration: A Framework for the New Definition from the Perspective of Multi-Subject Stakeholders—A Case Study of Nantou in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Nicole Lambrou, 2022. "Resilience Design in Practice: Future Climate Visions from California’s Bay Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Oto Novacek & Jesus Lopez Baeza & Jan Barski & Jorg Rainer Noenning, 2021. "Defining Parameters for Urban-Environmental Quality Assessment," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(4), pages 152-164, October.
    5. Rasa Pranskūnienė & Erika Zabulionienė, 2023. "Towards Heritage Transformation Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Zhixi Cecilia Zhuang, 2021. "The Negotiation of Space and Rights: Suburban Planning with Diversity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 113-126.
    7. Dalit Shach-Pinsly & Isaac Guedi Capeluto, 2020. "From Form-Based to Performance-Based Codes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Ensiyeh Ghavampour & Brenda Vale, 2019. "Revisiting the “Model of Place”: A Comparative Study of Placemaking and Sustainability," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 196-206.
    9. Rosalie Callway & Helen Pineo & Gemma Moore, 2020. "Understanding the Role of Standards in the Negotiation of a Healthy Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-26, November.
    10. Ibrahim Z. Bahreldin, 2020. "Beyond the Sit-In: Public Space Production and Appropriation in Sudan’s December Revolution, 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Chiara Garau & Alfonso Annunziata, 2020. "Supporting Children’s Independent Activities in Smart and Playable Public Places," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Barbara Ester Adele Piga & Nicola Rainisio & Gabriele Stancato & Marco Boffi, 2023. "Mapping the In-Motion Emotional Urban Experiences: An Evidence-Based Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    13. Alison Todes & Jennifer Robinson, 2020. "Re-directing developers: New models of rental housing development to re-shape the post-apartheid city?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 297-317, March.
    14. Carl A. Smith, 2022. "Community Drawing and Storytelling to Understand the Place Experience of Walking and Cycling in Dushanbe, Tajikistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Damiano Cerrone & Jesús López Baeza & Panu Lehtovuori & Daniele Quercia & Rossano Schifanella & Luca Aiello, 2021. "Implementing Gehl’s Theory to Study Urban Space. The Case of Monotowns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Muhammad Taufiq & Suhirman & Benedictus Kombaitan, 2021. "A Reflection on Transactive Planning: Transfer of Planning Knowledge in Local Community-Level Deliberation," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    17. İmran Gümüş & Ebru Yılmaz, 2022. "An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Everyday Life Rhythms and Urban Morphology: The Square Of Bursa Kent Meydani Shopping Center, Turkey," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    18. Michael Martin & Stephen Hincks & Iain Deas, 2020. "Temporary use in England’s core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3381-3401, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:825-:d:1115774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.