IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i12p2304-d1004498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection and Application of Quantitative Indicators of Paths Based on Graph Theory: A Case Study of Traditional Private and Antique Gardens in Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Yunda Wang

    (Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Chiba 271-8510, Japan)

  • Qiguan Shu

    (School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Ming Chen

    (School of Architecture & Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Engineering and Technology Research Center of Urbanization, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xudounan Chen

    (Department of Landscape Architecture Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Shiro Takeda

    (Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Chiba 271-8510, Japan)

  • Junhua Zhang

    (Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Chiba 271-8510, Japan)

Abstract

Chinese Traditional Gardens (CTGs) are an important part of China’s cultural inheritance from the past. Today’s China has experienced rapid urbanization, raising the need for a new form of contemporary gardens intended to satisfy peoples’ need for traditional culture. Garden paths are important in CTGs; they are designed to show visitors changing views with each step, and to lead them to secluded, quiet places via winding paths. This enhances the ornamental interest of the gardens. Based on plane graphics, this study evaluates the characteristics of three types of garden paths in fourteen traditional gardens and a contemporary antique garden, the Daguan Garden in Beijing. The analysis uses correlation and factor analysis to integrate 28 quantitative path indicators into five aspects of average, scale, network, wide, and aggregation. The 28 indicators can be expressed by six simple indicators: average connection length, number of path sections, alpha index, average width, average tortuous angle, and concentration degree. The results show small variations of garden paths between traditional gardens, but a considerable difference between the contemporary garden and traditional gardens. The research proposes a framework for the quantification and comparison of garden path features that can be applied before and after garden path construction, for both ancient and modern garden styles. This framework generates garden path feature values and theoretical values of six indicators, and is not constrained by the garden scale. Therefore, it provides an accurate and efficient design tool for garden designers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunda Wang & Qiguan Shu & Ming Chen & Xudounan Chen & Shiro Takeda & Junhua Zhang, 2022. "Selection and Application of Quantitative Indicators of Paths Based on Graph Theory: A Case Study of Traditional Private and Antique Gardens in Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2304-:d:1004498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuan, Zhiyuan & Zheng, Xinqi & Lv, Lina & Xue, Chunlu, 2014. "From design to digital model: A quantitative analysis approach to Garden Cities theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 289(C), pages 26-35.
    2. Vladimir Batagelj & Matevz Bren, 1995. "Comparing resemblance measures," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 12(1), pages 73-90, March.
    3. Huilin Liang & Weizheng Li & Siqi Lai & Wenli Jiang & Lingxi Zhu & Qingping Zhang, 2020. "How to survey, model, and measure rockeries in a Chinese classical garden: a case study for Huanxiu Shanzhuang, Suzhou, China," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 377-391, April.
    4. Hao Zou & Xiaojun Wang, 2021. "Progress and Gaps in Research on Urban Green Space Morphology: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Junwei Zeng & Yongsheng Qian & Zeyao Ren & Dejie Xu & Xuting Wei, 2019. "Road Landscape Morphology of Valley City Blocks under the Concept of “Open Block”—Taking Lanzhou City as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Patarasuk, Risa, 2013. "Road network connectivity and land-cover dynamics in Lop Buri province, Thailand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 111-123.
    7. Rui Zhang & Yuwei Zhao & Jianlei Kong & Chen Cheng & Xinyan Liu & Chang Zhang, 2021. "Intelligent Recognition Method of Decorative Openwork Windows with Sustainable Application for Suzhou Traditional Private Gardens in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Lämmer, Stefan & Gehlsen, Björn & Helbing, Dirk, 2006. "Scaling laws in the spatial structure of urban road networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 363(1), pages 89-95.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huishu Chen & Li Yang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Experience of Tour Routes in the Humble Administrator’s Garden Based on Isovist Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Batac, Rene C. & Cirunay, Michelle T., 2022. "Shortest paths along urban road network peripheries," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 597(C).
    2. Jeeno Soa George & Saikat Kumar Paul & Richa Dhawale, 2022. "Multilayer network structure and city size: A cross-sectional analysis of global cities to detect the correlation between street and terrain," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1448-1463, June.
    3. Matthijs Warrens, 2008. "Bounds of Resemblance Measures for Binary (Presence/Absence) Variables," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 25(2), pages 195-208, November.
    4. Sergio Porta & Vito Latora & Fahui Wang & Salvador Rueda & Emanuele Strano & Salvatore Scellato & Alessio Cardillo & Eugenio Belli & Francisco CÃ rdenas & Berta Cormenzana & Laura Latora, 2012. "Street Centrality and the Location of Economic Activities in Barcelona," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(7), pages 1471-1488, May.
    5. Karolina Dudzic-Gyurkovich, 2023. "Study of Centrality Measures in the Network of Green Spaces in the City of Krakow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
    6. Zhang, Tong & Zeng, Zhe & Jia, Tao & Li, Jing, 2016. "Examining the amenability of urban street networks for locating facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 457(C), pages 469-479.
    7. Chunyu Chen & Linglan Bi & Kuanfan Zhu, 2021. "Study on Spatial-Temporal Change of Urban Green Space in Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Driving Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Fabian Adelt & Johannes Weyer & Sebastian Hoffmann & Andreas Ihrig, 2018. "Simulation of the Governance of Complex Systems (SimCo): Basic Concepts and Experiments on Urban Transportation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 21(2), pages 1-2.
    9. Moreno Bonaventura & Luca Maria Aiello & Daniele Quercia & Vito Latora, 2021. "Predicting urban innovation from the US Workforce Mobility Network," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Mahyar, Hamidreza & Hasheminezhad, Rouzbeh & Ghalebi K., Elahe & Nazemian, Ali & Grosu, Radu & Movaghar, Ali & Rabiee, Hamid R., 2018. "Compressive sensing of high betweenness centrality nodes in networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 497(C), pages 166-184.
    11. Tsiotas, Dimitrios, 2021. "Drawing indicators of economic performance from network topology: The case of the interregional road transportation in Greece," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Xin Li & Yongsheng Qian & Junwei Zeng & Xuting Wei & Xiaoping Guang, 2022. "Measurement of Street Network Structure in Strip Cities: A Case Study of Lanzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Lihua Xu & Huifeng Xu & Tianyu Wang & Wenze Yue & Jinyang Deng & Liwei Mao, 2019. "Measuring Urban Spatial Activity Structures: A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Matthijs Warrens, 2008. "On the Indeterminacy of Resemblance Measures for Binary (Presence/Absence) Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 25(1), pages 125-136, June.
    15. Yingxue Rao & Yi Zhong & Qingsong He & Jingyi Dai, 2022. "Assessing the Equity of Accessibility to Urban Green Space: A Study of 254 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Giuseppe Salvia & Irene Pluchinotta & Ioanna Tsoulou & Gemma Moore & Nici Zimmermann, 2022. "Understanding Urban Green Space Usage through Systems Thinking: A Case Study in Thamesmead, London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Lina Yan & Yile Chen & Liang Zheng & Yi Zhang & Xiao Liang & Chun Zhu, 2023. "Intelligent Generation Method and Sustainable Application of Road Systems in Urban Green Spaces: Taking Jiangnan Gardens as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-80, February.
    18. Xue Li & Wen Li & Yu Gao, 2023. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Green Space Landscape Pattern in Harbin City Based on FLUS Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, February.
    19. Ermal Shpuza, 2023. "The shape and size of urban blocks," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 24-43, January.
    20. Masárová Jana & Ivanová Eva, 2016. "Road infrastructure in the regions of the Slovak Republic and Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 33(33), pages 79-90, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2304-:d:1004498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.