IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i12p2275-d1001118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Triple Spatial Effects of the Administrative Hierarchy on Urban Built-Up Areas in Fujian Province, China: Heterogeneity, Radiation, and Segmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Liu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University, Kaifeng 475003, China
    Academy of Hinterland Development, Henan University, Kaifeng 475003, China)

  • Zhuorui Yu

    (Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Taipa, Macau 999078, China)

  • Daining Liu

    (Academy of Hinterland Development, Henan University, Kaifeng 475003, China)

  • Hao Zhang

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China)

  • Long Zhou

    (Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Taipa, Macau 999078, China)

  • Guoqiang Shen

    (Department of Regional and Urban Planning, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Chasong Zhu

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Yiheng Sun

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University, Kaifeng 475003, China)

  • Yanran Wang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University, Kaifeng 475003, China
    School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

Abstract

The expansion of urban built-up areas is one of the most prominent characteristics of land use change in China. A growing body of literature has emphasized the triple spatial effects of the administrative hierarchy on urban built-up areas expansion, including heterogeneity, radiation, and segmentation. However, the existing studies have mainly focused on the administrative hierarchy at the prefectural level and above and have primarily concentrated on one single effect; few have integrated the triple effects as a whole. Based on high-resolution land use data and taking Fujian province as a study case, this study proposes an integrated theoretical framework and modeling approach and investigates the triple spatial effects of administrative hierarchy on built-up areas at the prefectural level and below. Descriptive statistics show the following: (1) Built-up areas of municipal districts are significantly larger than those of county-level units, showing the heterogeneity characteristics of urban land distribution across different levels of administrative hierarchy; (2) The county-level units adjacent to municipal districts exploit more built-up areas than other county-level units, indicating the radiation effects of municipal districts; (3) The radiation effects tend to be reduced if a municipal district and its adjacent county-level units are not located in the same prefectural city, revealing the segmentation effects among the different prefectural cities. Using the spatial econometric model with regimes, we further find the following: (1) The strengths of driving forces of built-up areas are heterogeneous between municipal districts and county-level units, and there are significant spatial interactions among administrative units; (2) The spatial interactions between municipal districts and county-level units are stronger than those between two county-level units, but the strength is restricted by the prefectural boundary, reflecting the radiation effects of municipal districts and the segmentation effects of the prefectural boundary, respectively. By investigating the triple spatial effects of the administrative hierarchy on urban built-up areas, we conclude that comprehensively considering these triple effects as a whole will result in a fuller understanding of the rapid built-up areas expansion in China, especially at the prefectural level and below.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Liu & Zhuorui Yu & Daining Liu & Hao Zhang & Long Zhou & Guoqiang Shen & Chasong Zhu & Yiheng Sun & Yanran Wang, 2022. "Triple Spatial Effects of the Administrative Hierarchy on Urban Built-Up Areas in Fujian Province, China: Heterogeneity, Radiation, and Segmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2275-:d:1001118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongjian Liu & Hong Geng, 2019. "Regional Competition in China under the Price Distortion of Construction Land: A Study Based on a Two‐regime Spatial Durbin Model," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 27(4), pages 104-126, July.
    2. Jingxiang Zhang & Fulong Wu, 2006. "China's changing economic governance: Administrative annexation and the reorganization of local governments in the Yangtze River Delta," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 3-21.
    3. Bastian Heider & Martin T. W. Rosenfeld & Albrecht Kauffmann, 2018. "Does Administrative Status Matter for Urban Growth? Evidence from Present and Former County Capitals in East Germany," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 33-54, March.
    4. Colsaet, Alice & Laurans, Yann & Levrel, Harold, 2018. "What drives land take and urban land expansion? A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 339-349.
    5. Qingke Yang & Xuejun Duan & Lei Wang, 2017. "Spatial–Temporal Patterns and Driving Factors of Rapid Urban Land Development in Provincial China: A Case Study of Jiangsu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Jinlong Gao & Yehua Dennis Wei & Wen Chen & Komali Yenneti, 2015. "Urban Land Expansion and Structural Change in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-27, July.
    7. Dong Ouyang & Xigang Zhu & Xingguang Liu & Renfei He & Qian Wan, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation and Driving Factor Analysis of Urban Construction Land Change in County-Level City of Guangxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Fan, Jianshuang & Zhou, Lin, 2019. "Three-dimensional intergovernmental competition and urban sprawl: Evidence from Chinese prefectural-level cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    9. Petra A. Jong & Aleid E. Brouwer & Philip McCann, 2016. "Moving up and down the urban hierarchy: age-articulated interregional migration flows in the Netherlands," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 57(1), pages 145-164, July.
    10. Canfei He & Yehua Dennis Wei & Xiuzhen Xie, 2008. "Globalization, Institutional Change, and Industrial Location: Economic Transition and Industrial Concentration in China," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 923-945.
    11. Yunfeng Cen & Pengyan Zhang & Yuhang Yan & Wenlong Jing & Yu Zhang & Yanyan Li & Dan Yang & Xin Liu & Wenliang Geng & Tianqi Rong, 2019. "Spatial and Temporal Agglomeration Characteristics and Coupling Relationship of Urban Built-Up Land and Economic Hinterland—A Case Study of the Lower Yellow River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Jin, Wanfu & Zhou, Chunshan & Zhang, Guojun, 2020. "Characteristics of state-owned construction land supply in Chinese cities by development stage and industry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Chen Zeng & Zhe Zhao & Cheng Wen & Jing Yang & Tianyu Lv, 2020. "Effect of Complex Road Networks on Intensive Land Use in China’s Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Pengrui Wang & Chen Zeng & Yan Song & Long Guo & Wenping Liu & Wenting Zhang, 2021. "The Spatial Effect of Administrative Division on Land-Use Intensity," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Wanfu & Zhou, Chunshan & Zhang, Guojun, 2020. "Characteristics of state-owned construction land supply in Chinese cities by development stage and industry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Zhanzhong Tang & Zengxiang Zhang & Lijun Zuo & Xiao Wang & Shunguang Hu & Zijuan Zhu, 2020. "Spatial Econometric Analysis of the Relationship between Urban Land and Regional Economic Development in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Coordinated Development Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Kaihuai Liao & Wenyan Huang & Changjian Wang & Rong Wu & Yang Hu, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution Features and Impact Factors of Urban Expansion in Underdeveloped Cities: A Case Study of Nanchang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Pengrui Wang & Chen Zeng & Yan Song & Long Guo & Wenping Liu & Wenting Zhang, 2021. "The Spatial Effect of Administrative Division on Land-Use Intensity," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Huan Lu & Ruiyang Wang & Rong Ye & Jinzhao Fan, 2023. "Monitoring Long-Term Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Urban Expansion Using Multisource Remote Sensing Images and Historical Maps: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Wei Pan & Jing Wang & Zhi Lu & Yurui Li, 2023. "Swelling Cities? Detecting China’s Urban Land Transition Based on Time Series Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Guo, Zelian & Hu, Yecui & Zheng, Xinqi, 2020. "Evaluating the effectiveness of land use master plans in built-up land management: A case study of the Jinan Municipality, eastern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Huan Li & Yehua Dennis Wei & Elfie Swerts, 2020. "Spatial inequality in the city-regions in the Yangtze River Valley, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 672-689, February.
    9. Lei Zhou & Shan Yang & Shuguang Wang & Liyang Xiong, 2017. "Ownership reform and the changing manufacturing landscape in Chinese cities: The case of Wuxi," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Zhang, Pengyan & Yang, Dan & Qin, Mingzhou & Jing, Wenlong, 2020. "Spatial heterogeneity analysis and driving forces exploring of built-up land development intensity in Chinese prefecture-level cities and implications for future Urban Land intensive use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Eveline S. van Leeuwen & Viktor A. Venhorst, 2021. "Do households prefer to move up or down the urban hierarchy during an economic crisis?," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 263-289, April.
    12. Fulong Wu, 2016. "China's Emergent City-Region Governance: A New Form of State Spatial Selectivity through State-orchestrated Rescaling," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1134-1151, November.
    13. Lei Wan & Huiyu Liu & Haibo Gong & Yujia Ren, 2020. "Effects of Climate and Land Use changes on Vegetation Dynamics in the Yangtze River Delta, China Based on Abrupt Change Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Shimei Wu & Haotian Zhang, 2022. "The existence and mechanism of the domestic pollution haven hypothesis: evidence from 265 cities in China," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 287-310, December.
    15. Lei Ding & Xuejuan Fang, 2022. "Spatial–temporal distribution of air-pollution-intensive industries and its social-economic driving mechanism in Zhejiang Province, China: a framework of spatial econometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1681-1712, February.
    16. Zhonghua Cheng & Xiaowen Hu, 2023. "The effects of urbanization and urban sprawl on CO2 emissions in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1792-1808, February.
    17. Anping Chen & Nicolaas Groenewold, 2017. "An increase in the retirement age in China: the regional economic effects," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(7), pages 702-721, February.
    18. Lin Meng & Wentao Si, 2022. "The Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Expansion from 2005 to 2018: The Case of Yangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Pengfei Ban & Wei Zhan & Qifeng Yuan & Xiaojian Li, 2021. "Delineating the Urban Areas of a Cross-Boundary City with Open-Access Data: Guangzhou–Foshan, South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Xiwei Zhu & Ye Liu & Ming He & Deming Luo & Yiyun Wu, 2019. "Entrepreneurship and industrial clusters: evidence from China industrial census," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 595-616, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2275-:d:1001118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.