IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1744-d936491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accelerate the Mobilization of African and International Scientific Expertise to Boost Interdisciplinary Research for the Success of the Sahelian Great Green Wall by 2030

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Bruckmann

    (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Eco & Sols, Universités Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAE, SupAgro, 34060 Montpellier, France)

  • Jean-Luc Chotte

    (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Eco & Sols, Universités Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAE, SupAgro, 34060 Montpellier, France)

  • Robin Duponnois

    (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, LSTM, Universités Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAE, SupAgro, 34398 Montpellier, France)

  • Maud Loireau

    (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Espace-DEV, Universités Montpellier, de la Réunion, de Guyane, des Antilles, de Perpignan, 66860 Perpignan, France)

  • Benjamin Sultan

    (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR 228 Espace-Dev, 34093 Montpellier, France)

Abstract

The Sahelian Great Green Wall (SGGW) is an influential project to combat desertification and promote sustainable land management on a large scale, involving 11 countries in the Sahel region of Africa. The UNCCD’s 2020 progress report showed a mixed picture concerning the meeting of the initial targets. At the One Planet Summit in 2021, announcements were made to consolidate the implementation of the SGGW, most notably with the creation of the Great Green Wall Accelerator. In this context, our paper sets out to review the scientific work conducted with regard to the SGGW. We have thus carried out a bibliometric analysis of the literature on SGGW. Although the initiative involves 11 countries and covers a large spectrum of scientific disciplines, our results show the predominance of ecological studies in the SGGW literature and a concentration of studies in certain geographies of interest, such as northern Senegal. Moreover, based on a secondary analysis of publications on land restoration and sustainable ecosystem management in Sahelian countries, we show that the literature relevant to SGGW topics is richer and fills in the information gaps we have identified at thematic and geographical levels. By showing that SGGW studies are overly focused on certain topics and geographical areas, our paper argues for a better interdisciplinary mobilization of researchers working on GGW-related topics. The scientific and operational success of the project depends on stronger networking between the different research teams and themes, both in Africa and internationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Bruckmann & Jean-Luc Chotte & Robin Duponnois & Maud Loireau & Benjamin Sultan, 2022. "Accelerate the Mobilization of African and International Scientific Expertise to Boost Interdisciplinary Research for the Success of the Sahelian Great Green Wall by 2030," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1744-:d:936491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David O'Connor & James Ford, 2014. "Increasing the Effectiveness of the “Great Green Wall” as an Adaptation to the Effects of Climate Change and Desertification in the Sahel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Bokary Allaye Kelly & Sidi Sanogo & Sory I. Sidibé & Elena Castillo-Lorenzo & Paolo Ceci & Tiziana Ulian, 2021. "Restoring vegetation and degraded lands by using assisted natural regeneration approach (ANRA): case study at Bankass in the centre of Mali, West Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 14123-14139, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beatrice Asenso Barnieh & Li Jia & Massimo Menenti & Jie Zhou & Yelong Zeng, 2020. "Mapping Land Use Land Cover Transitions at Different Spatiotemporal Scales in West Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-52, October.
    2. Stephen Fox, 2019. "Moveable Production Systems for Sustainable Development and Trade: Limitations, Opportunities and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1744-:d:936491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.