IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i10p487-d950025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Remains Unsolved in Sub-African Environmental Exposure Information Disclosure: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Abd Alwahed Dagestani

    (School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Lingli Qing

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48547, Korea)

  • Mohamad Abou Houran

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

Background: Africa comprises the bulk of struggling economies. However, Sub-Saharan Africa is experiencing rapid industrialization and urbanization. Excessive resource use, pollution, and the absence of relevant environmental disclosure are factors that contribute to these human-made damages. Environmental pollution as a threat to sustainable development results from these damages. Although it has been established that Sub-Saharan Africa would benefit from resource-management development, sustainable environmental strategies, and a reduction in urbanization and persistent poverty, the information on these issues has not been made public. Objective: To provide a full account of the level of environmental-exposure disclosure in Sub-Saharan African countries, including the current level of progress, gaps, and prospects, we reviewed the literature on environmental exposure information research in African populations. Methodology: We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, or books examining environmental exposure and information disclosure in human populations in Africa. Results: In total, 89 full-text articles were eligible for the inclusion criteria. A quality assessment of the retrieved articles using the PRISMA guidelines resulted in the exclusion of 40 articles; therefore, 49 studies were included in the final analysis. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the environmental exposure information on household injuries, the use of chemicals such as pesticides in farming, industry-linked vectors and diseases, laboratory chemical exposure, industrial exposure, and epigenetic factors are not well-disclosed to the population. Conclusion: Environmental information disclosure standards should be incorporated into central-government policy recommendations. Standards should identify polluting industries, and companies should refrain from the voluntary disclosure of environmental information to manage their reputation. Heavy-pollution industries should be made sufficiently transparent to lessen the company–media collusion on information disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Abd Alwahed Dagestani & Lingli Qing & Mohamad Abou Houran, 2022. "What Remains Unsolved in Sub-African Environmental Exposure Information Disclosure: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:487-:d:950025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/487/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/487/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Sampong & Na Song & Kingsley Osei Boahene & Kwame Ansong Wadie, 2018. "Disclosure of CSR Performance and Firm Value: New Evidence from South Africa on the Basis of the GRI Guidelines for Sustainability Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mumtaheena Anwar & Sohanur Rahman & Md. Nurul Kabir, 2021. "Does national carbon pricing policy affect voluntary environmental disclosures? A global evidence," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(2), pages 211-244, April.
    2. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Juan José Maldonado-Briegas, 2019. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Culture Programs Promoting Social Responsibility: A European Regional Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Yuqiu Lu & Guowei Li & Zhe Luo & Muhammad Anwar & Yunju Zhang, 2021. "Does Intellectual Capital Spur Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Growth?: A Study of Chinese and Pakistani Firms," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    4. Zixin Zhang & Teck Lee Yap & Jiyoung Park, 2021. "Does voluntary CSR disclosure and CSR performance influence earnings management? Empirical evidence from China," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 161-178, June.
    5. Matteo Pozzoli & Marcello Raffaele, 2022. "Non-financial information and company market value," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2 Suppl.), pages 167-187.
    6. Feifei Zhang & Jin-young Jung, 2020. "Changes in the Influence of Social Responsibility Activities on Corporate Value over 10 Years in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Evans Opoku-Mensah & Yuming Yin & Bismark Addai, 2021. "Do Mature Firms Gain Higher Economic Value from R&D Investment?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 211-223, June.
    8. Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu & Shailesh Rastogi & Rebecca Abraham, 2022. "The Influence of Transparency and Disclosure on the Valuation of Banks in India: The Moderating Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance Variables, Shareholder Activism, and Market Power," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Liang Li & Yanghong Wang & Huaping Sun & Huihui Shen & Yuen Lin, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and Financial Performance: Is Green Technology Innovation a Missing Link?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Takuya Kiriu & Masatoshi Nozaki, 2020. "A Text Mining Model to Evaluate Firms’ ESG Activities: An Application for Japanese Firms," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 27(4), pages 621-632, December.
    11. Monday Nweke Igwe & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Ayman Hassan Bazhair, 2023. "Sustainability reporting in Africa: A systematic review and agenda for future research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2081-2100, September.
    12. Hamzeh Al Amosh & Saleh F. A. Khatib, 2021. "Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: the case of Jordan," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(12), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Andrej Miklosik & Peter Starchon & Milos Hitka, 2021. "Environmental sustainability disclosures in annual reports of ASX Industrials List companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16227-16245, November.
    14. Akhtar Ali & Imran Abbas Jadoon, 2022. "The Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Performance (CSP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-31, July.
    15. Ali Meftah Gerged & Rami Salem & Eshani Beddewela, 2023. "How does transparency into global sustainability initiatives influence firm value? Insights from Anglo‐American countries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4519-4547, November.
    16. Rabi Narayan Kar & Amanpreet Kaur, 2023. "Do Disclosures Drive Socially Responsible Investing?," Paradigm, , vol. 27(1), pages 7-26, June.
    17. Evans Opoku-Mensah & Yuming Yin & Asantewaa Ampofo Sandra & Priscilla Tuffour, 2019. "Mergers and Acquisitions Antecedents in BRICS," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 11(3), pages 202-214, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:487-:d:950025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.