IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v4y2007i3p216-223d2346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genotoxicity of Air Borne Particulates Assessed by Comet and the Salmonella Mutagenicity Test in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Sufian M. ElAssouli

    (Medical Biology Department, 2Family & Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80205, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohamed H. AlQahtani

    (Medical Biology Department, 2Family & Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80205, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Waleed Milaat

    (Medical Biology Department, 2Family & Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80205, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Fine airborne respirable particulates less than 10 micrometer (PM10) are considered one of the top environmental public health concerns, since they contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) which are among the major carcinogenic compounds found in urban air. The objective of this study is to assess the genotoxicity of the ambient PM10 collected at 11 urban sites in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The PM10 extractable organic matter (EOM) was examined for its genotoxicity by the single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) comet assay and the Salmonella mutagenicity (Ames) test .Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to quantify 16 PAH compounds in four sites. Samples from oil refinery and heavy diesel vehicles traffic sites showed significant DNA damage causing comet in 20-44% of the cells with tail moments ranging from 0.5-2.0 compared to samples from petrol driven cars and residential area, with comet in less than 2% of the cells and tail moments of 3 , mean while residential and reference sites caused 2-15 rev /m 3 . The genotoxicity of the EOM in both tests directly correlated with the amount of organic particulate and the PAHs concentrations in the air samples. The PAHs concentrations ranged between 0.83 ng/m 3 in industrial and heavy diesel vehicles traffic sites to 0.18 ng /m 3 in the residential area. Benzo(ghi)pyrene was the major PAH components and at one site it represented 65.4 % of the total PAHs. Samples of the oil refinery site were more genotoxic in the SCGE assay than samples from the heavy diesel vehicles traffic site, despite the fact that both sites contain almost similar amount of PAHs. The opposite was true for the mutagenicity in the Ames test. This could be due to the nature of the EOM in both sites. These findings confirm the genotoxic potency of the PM10 organic extracts to which urban populations are exposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sufian M. ElAssouli & Mohamed H. AlQahtani & Waleed Milaat, 2007. "Genotoxicity of Air Borne Particulates Assessed by Comet and the Salmonella Mutagenicity Test in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-8, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:4:y:2007:i:3:p:216-223:d:2346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/4/3/216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/4/3/216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Abu-Elmagd & Mansour A. Alghamdi & Magdy Shamy & Mamdouh I. Khoder & Max Costa & Mourad Assidi & Roaa Kadam & Haneen Alsehli & Mamdooh Gari & Peter Natesan Pushparaj & Gauthaman Kalamegam & M, 2017. "Evaluation of the Effects of Airborne Particulate Matter on Bone Marrow-Mesenchymal Stem Cells (BM-MSCs): Cellular, Molecular and Systems Biological Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Marta Gea & Sara Bonetta & Daniele Marangon & Francesco Antonio Pitasi & Caterina Armato & Giorgio Gilli & Fabrizio Bert & Marco Fontana & Tiziana SchilirĂ², 2021. "In Vitro Effects of Particulate Matter Associated with a Wildland Fire in the North-West of Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:4:y:2007:i:3:p:216-223:d:2346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.