IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i3p353-d1357926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Community Health Workers in Relation to Environmental Health Hazards in the Nelson Mandela Bay

Author

Listed:
  • David G. Morton

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa)

  • Mpinane F. Senekane

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa)

Abstract

Background: Community health workers (CHWs) cover extensive areas observing the environmental conditions in which community members live. However, current CHW training modules do not have modules focusing specifically on environmental health. CHWs appear to lack knowledge of environmental health hazards, and little is known of their attitudes and practices regarding environmental health hazards. The purpose of this study was to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of CHWs in relation to environmental health hazards in the Nelson Mandela Bay (NMB). Methods: This study used a quantitative, cross-sectional research design. A sample of 110 respondents completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire was based on the literature, consisting of 36 items in four sections. Data analysis consisted of descriptive and inferential statistics. Reliability and validity were enhanced by utilizing a pre-test study. Results: There were significant differences in attitudes (t = −2.308, df = 91.107, p = 0.023) and practices (t = −2.936, df = 62.491, p = 0.005). Those trained in environmental health had a significantly lower mean attitudes score (m = 3.2365, sd = 1.113) compared to those not trained in environmental health (m = 3.694, sd = 0.894). In addition, those trained in environmental health had a significantly lower mean practice score (practiced more frequently) (m = 1.231, sd = 0.327) compared to those not trained in environmental health (m = 1.4605, sd = 0.4162). Regarding training, 62% ( n = 67) of CHWs felt they needed additional training in environmental health. Conclusion: Most of the CHWs had a moderate knowledge of environmental health hazards. Furthermore, most of the CHWs had a very positive or positive attitude towards environmental health hazards. However, there is a need for CHWs to receive very specific training in environmental health. In addition, the scope of work of CHWs, as well as their role in relation to environmental health, needs to be further explored.

Suggested Citation

  • David G. Morton & Mpinane F. Senekane, 2024. "Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Community Health Workers in Relation to Environmental Health Hazards in the Nelson Mandela Bay," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:3:p:353-:d:1357926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/353/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/353/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angela Mathee & Jocelyn Moyes & Thulisa Mkhencele & Jackie Kleynhans & Brigitte Language & Stuart Piketh & Elias Moroe & Floidy Wafawanaka & Neil Martinson & Meredith McMorrow & Stefano Tempia & Kathl, 2021. "Housing Quality in a Rural and an Urban Settlement in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Fletcher Njororai & Daniel Ganu & Kogutu Caleb Nyaranga & Cholo Wilberforce, 2021. "Role of Socio-Demographic and Environmental Determinants on Performance of Community Health Workers in Western Kenya," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:3:p:353-:d:1357926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.