IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i3p344-d1357020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food Security and Diet Quality Improvements among At-Risk, Low-Income, Older Adults following a Free Meal Pilot Program

Author

Listed:
  • Makenzie Barr-Porter

    (Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Kendra OoNorasak

    (Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Tammy Stephenson

    (Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Ryan Goodson

    (College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Sofia Bonilla

    (College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Abraham Alhamdani

    (Department of Neuroscience, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

Abstract

Older adults are at a greater risk for food insecurity compared to the general population. This study aimed to describe changes in diet quality and food insecurity following a free meal program at low-income, older adult housing complexes. Study participants were recruited from two low-income older adult public housing complexes in Kentucky. Fifty participants were enrolled and received 1–4 free weekly meals across 3 months as part of the Meals on Wings pilot program. Surveys and a 24 h dietary recall were completed at baseline and 3 months. Participants were predominately female, 69 years of age, and Black or African American race. Food security status (FSS) and dietary quality through the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) were assessed as primary measures. Participants were placed in “at-risk” categories of the (1a) lower quartile of the HEI and (1b) lower than 51% HEI, or (2) “low” or “very low” food security status based on the USDA Household Food Security Screener (FSS). Multiple linear regression (MLR) models were conducted for HEI and FSS scores to include time, group, time*group interaction, and control of meal utilization percentage (i.e., dose). The MLR for the HEI quartile had a significant time by quartile interaction that was present for an increase in the HEI in Q1 ( n = 12; 32.42 ± 5.95% to n = 6; 46.10 ± 10.62%; p < 0.0001) and a decrease in the HEI for Q4 ( n = 12; 70.68 ± 7.13% to n = 9; 52.36 ± 11.57%; p < 0.0001). For those low food security participants ( n = 24; 48.0%), the average food insecurity score from the 6-item USDA screener improved from 4.09 ± 1.62 at baseline to 2.63 ± 2.41 at 3 months ( p = 0.0064). The MLR for the FSS had a significant group*time interaction ( p = 0.0071). In our population, particularly those vulnerable with lowest dietary quality and food insecurity status, we did see improvements across the free meal pilot program. However, a small sample, limited generalizability, and limited data collection measures urge caution when using these results to extrapolate for the general population. However, the current results are promising and should encourage further investigation of the effects of meal assistance programs on the health and well-being of older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Makenzie Barr-Porter & Kendra OoNorasak & Tammy Stephenson & Ryan Goodson & Sofia Bonilla & Abraham Alhamdani, 2024. "Food Security and Diet Quality Improvements among At-Risk, Low-Income, Older Adults following a Free Meal Pilot Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:3:p:344-:d:1357020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/344/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:7859 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Carla Pezzia & Magda C. Rogg & Tammy Leonard, 2023. "Food security status in seniors over their life course," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 300-316, March.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:8081 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:mpr:mprres:7860 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James P. Ziliak & Craig Gundersen & Anna Vaudin, 2023. "Introduction to senior hunger special issue," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 221-233, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:3:p:344-:d:1357020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.