IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i2p186-d1334406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wearable Technology: A Wellbeing Option for Serving Police Officers and Staff? A Comparison of Results of a Pilot Study with Firearms Officers and a Group of Mixed Officers and Staff

Author

Listed:
  • Carol Cox

    (Liverpool Centre for Advanced Policing Studies, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, UK)

  • James Yates

    (Liverpool Centre for Advanced Policing Studies, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, UK)

  • Freya O’Brien

    (Liverpool Centre for Advanced Policing Studies, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, UK)

  • Laura Pajon

    (Liverpool Centre for Advanced Policing Studies, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, UK)

  • Amanda Farrell

    (Liverpool Centre for Advanced Policing Studies, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, UK)

  • Moya Ward

    (Liverpool Centre for Advanced Policing Studies, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, UK)

  • Philippa McCabe

    (Liverpool Centre for Advanced Policing Studies, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, UK)

  • Adrian James

    (Liverpool Centre for Advanced Policing Studies, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, UK)

  • Isabella McNamara-Catalano

    (Liverpool Centre for Advanced Policing Studies, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, UK)

Abstract

The high-stress nature of policing contributes to deterioration of officer health and wellbeing as well as high levels of absenteeism and attrition. Wearable technology (WT) has been identified as a potential tool that can help in improving officer health and wellbeing. This pilot study aimed to give initial insight into acceptability and engagement with WT amongst officers. The study also aimed to uncover any notable areas for exploration in future research within the domain of officer health and wellbeing. Two groups were observed, firearms officers and a mixed group of officers. Participants wore the WT for an extended period, completed a variety of health and wellbeing questionnaires and discussed their experience in focus groups. Firearms officers and mixed group officers displayed similar sleep efficiency, but firearms officers have worse sleep consistency and sleep performance. Firearms officers appear to have higher HRV and a slightly lower resting heart rate. Both groups display reasonable acceptance of the use of WT, speaking favorably during the focus groups of how monitoring the data had improved their quality of life in terms of their understanding of sleep, wellbeing and how they had consequently completed lifestyle modification. WT offers some promise in managing officer health and wellbeing; studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol Cox & James Yates & Freya O’Brien & Laura Pajon & Amanda Farrell & Moya Ward & Philippa McCabe & Adrian James & Isabella McNamara-Catalano, 2024. "Wearable Technology: A Wellbeing Option for Serving Police Officers and Staff? A Comparison of Results of a Pilot Study with Firearms Officers and a Group of Mixed Officers and Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:186-:d:1334406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/2/186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/2/186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:186-:d:1334406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.