IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i2p156-d1329919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study on the Periodontal Parameters Used in Diagnosing Periodontitis in Puerperae and Periodontitis’ Relationship with the Birth of Preterm Infants: A Case-Control Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nayra Rodrigues de Vasconcelos Calixto

    (Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil)

  • Fernanda Ferreira Lopes

    (Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil
    Department of Dentistry II, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil)

  • Marcela Mayana Pereira Franco

    (Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil)

  • Isaac Suzart Gomes-Filho

    (Department of Health, State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana 44036-900, Brazil)

  • Bruno Braga Benatti

    (Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil
    Department of Dentistry II, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil)

  • Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves

    (Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil
    Department of Dentistry II, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil)

Abstract

To compare different criteria for the diagnosis of periodontitis and to evaluate the association of this condition with prematurity, this case-control study was conducted on 283 mothers of infants, divided into two groups based on gestational age (cases: <37 weeks, controls: ≥37 weeks), with 71 cases and 212 controls. The periodontal evaluation included probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index, and bleeding on probing (BOP). Participants were classified regarding periodontitis per 14 criteria based on different periodontal parameters. The criterion selected as the gold standard was the presence of at least four teeth with one or more sites with a PD ≥ 4 mm, CAL ≥ 3 mm, and BOP at the same site. The prevalence of periodontal disease ranged from 8.1% to 55.1%. Moreover, compared to the gold standard, the sensitivities of the other criteria were 100%, while specificity ranged from 50.4% to 96.4%. Periodontitis, defined by six of the selected criteria, was associated with prematurity after multivariate adjustment, with OR ranging from 1.85 to 2.69 and 95% CI from 1.01 to 5.56; one of them was the gold standard mentioned above. Measurements using the clinical parameters of PD, CAL, and bleeding at the same site (criteria 5, 6, 7, 8), CPI (criterion 10), and at least four teeth with a PD ≥ 4 mm and CAL ≥ 3 mm (criterion 11) to define periodontitis showed a statistically significant association ( p < 0.05). Given this study’s limitations, we can conclude that the diagnostic criteria for a periodontitis definition using a PD ≥ 4 mm and CAL ≥ 3 mm in two or more teeth, with BOP at the same site, seem stronger when detecting an association between periodontitis and prematurity.

Suggested Citation

  • Nayra Rodrigues de Vasconcelos Calixto & Fernanda Ferreira Lopes & Marcela Mayana Pereira Franco & Isaac Suzart Gomes-Filho & Bruno Braga Benatti & Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves, 2024. "Comparative Study on the Periodontal Parameters Used in Diagnosing Periodontitis in Puerperae and Periodontitis’ Relationship with the Birth of Preterm Infants: A Case-Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:156-:d:1329919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/2/156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/2/156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:156-:d:1329919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.