IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i1p103-d1320774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pilot Evaluation of a Remote Psychotherapy Service for Students Who Self-Harm: University–Community Outpatient Psychotherapy Engagement (U-COPE)

Author

Listed:
  • Joanne Worsley

    (Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK)

  • Danielle Young

    (Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK)

  • Paula Harrison

    (Student Administration and Support, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7XZ, UK)

  • Rhiannon Corcoran

    (Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK)

Abstract

Self-harm is becoming increasingly common in student populations. Brief psychological therapies might be helpful for those who have recently self-harmed. The current paper reports on an evaluation of a brief psychotherapy service delivered via remote means, namely University–Community Outpatient Psychotherapy Engagement (U-COPE). The service combines elements of psychodynamic interpersonal and cognitive analytic therapy to help students who present with self-harm related difficulties. The primary aim was to understand students’ and practitioners’ experiences of a remote psychotherapy service. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a total of nine participants (seven students and two practitioners). Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis. Analyses of the interviews across the stakeholders revealed three overarching themes: ‘Accessibility’; ‘Therapeutic experiences’; and ‘Spaces and places of therapy’. Students appreciated the rapid access to intervention, especially as student services are typically characterised by long waiting lists. Despite the brief nature of the intervention, many students reported feeling a sense of control over the direction and pace of the therapeutic sessions, which is an important consideration for those who self-harm. The findings suggest that U-COPE may be helpful to students with difficulties related to self-harm. Further investigation of this brief intervention is warranted in order to ascertain whether U-COPE has a long-term impact on difficulties and distress-related behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanne Worsley & Danielle Young & Paula Harrison & Rhiannon Corcoran, 2024. "Pilot Evaluation of a Remote Psychotherapy Service for Students Who Self-Harm: University–Community Outpatient Psychotherapy Engagement (U-COPE)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:103-:d:1320774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/1/103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/1/103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:103-:d:1320774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.