IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p4941-d1094253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Cognitive Training Reduce Falls across Ten Years?: Data from the ACTIVE Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Briana N. Sprague

    (Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, University of Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA)

  • Lesley A. Ross

    (Department of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA)

  • Karlene K. Ball

    (Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of cognitive training on the risk of experiencing a fall across 10 years. The study used data from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) randomized controlled trial. Older adults aged 65–94 were randomly assigned to speed of processing, memory, or reasoning training or to a no-contact control group ( n = 2802). The experience of a fall in the prior two months was assessed at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years posttest. Cox proportional hazards explored group differences in the total sample, as well as group differences for participants classified as low risk ( n = 2360) and high risk ( n = 442) for future falls. The data were censored at the first reported fall postbaseline. After baseline, 983 (35.08%) participants across the full sample reported a fall. There were no significant effects of the training in the full sample or in the low-risk sample of participants. However, the participants at greater risk for future falls in the speed of processing training group were 31% less likely (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.48, 0.998, p = 0.049) to experience a subsequent fall across ten years compared to the control group. Reasoning and memory training did not reduce a future fall in the high-risk sample. The speed of processing training reduced the risk of future falls across ten years in the high-risk participants. Future work should examine moderators and mediators of training in at-risk samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Briana N. Sprague & Lesley A. Ross & Karlene K. Ball, 2023. "Does Cognitive Training Reduce Falls across Ten Years?: Data from the ACTIVE Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4941-:d:1094253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4941/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4941/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Briana N Sprague & Christine B Phillips & Lesley A Ross, 2019. "Age-Varying Relationships Between Physical Function and Cognition in Older Adulthood," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(5), pages 772-784.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenwei Pan & Huijuan Zhao & Qiaoling Du & Yong Xu & Dajun Tian & Shuo Xiao & Haiyin Wang & Xiao Wei & Chunfeng Wu & Yuanyuan Ruan & Chunhua Zhao & Gonghua Tao & Weiwei Zheng, 2022. "Path Analysis Reveals the Direct Effect of PCB28 Exposure on Cognitive Dysfunction in Older Chinese Females," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4941-:d:1094253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.