IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p4848-d1092673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Gathering about Pregnancy, Birth, and Puerperium—Good and Fake Information

Author

Listed:
  • Oezden Oyman

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Joy Fest

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baden Regional Hospital, 5404 Baden, Switzerland)

  • Roland Zimmermann

    (Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
    Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Ladina Vonzun

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
    Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Recent research on the subject of information-gathering processes among pregnant women has revealed a shift towards online sources. Health professionals’ knowledge about sources of information has been shown to improve the understanding and counseling of patients. The objective of this study was to create an overview of all types of sources relevant to information gathering and to put their role and perception into perspective. Methods: A total of 249 women were included in this study and recruited over a period of one month at the University Hospital of Zurich (USZ). Exclusion criteria included cases of fetal demise and late abortions. The survey on information-gathering processes was divided into three stages: pregnancy, birth, and puerperium. The different sources of information were compared based on women’s characteristics. Results: The response rate was 78% (n = 197). The main findings include a significant difference in information gathering based on varying levels of education, with women at the lowest educational level using the Internet the least during pregnancy ( p = 0.029). During puerperium, significant differences could be observed in the involvement of the gynecologist. Primipara women as well as women of lower educational levels contacted their gynecologist less in contrast to multipara women ( p = 0.006) and women of higher educational levels ( p = 0.011). Overall, health professionals were considered to be the most important source of information. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that parity and educational level influence the information-gathering process. As the most important source for information gathering, health professionals must use this advantage to better assist their patients in accessing reliable information.

Suggested Citation

  • Oezden Oyman & Joy Fest & Roland Zimmermann & Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble & Ladina Vonzun, 2023. "Information Gathering about Pregnancy, Birth, and Puerperium—Good and Fake Information," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-9, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4848-:d:1092673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4848/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4848/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4848-:d:1092673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.