IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4193-d1081216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Alarms in a Gynaecological Surgical Unit: A Retrospective Data Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Juho O. Jämsä

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Kimmo H. Uutela

    (GE Healthcare, 00510 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Anna-Maija Tapper

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
    Hyvinkää Hospital, Helsinki and Uusimaa University Hospital District, 05850 Hyvinkää, Finland)

  • Lasse Lehtonen

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
    Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00260 Helsinki, Finland)

Abstract

Alarm fatigue refers to the desensitisation of medical staff to patient monitor clinical alarms, which may lead to slower response time or total ignorance of alarms and thereby affects patient safety. The reasons behind alarm fatigue are complex; the main contributing factors include the high number of alarms and the poor positive predictive value of alarms. The study was performed in the Surgery and Anaesthesia Unit of the Women’s Hospital, Helsinki, by collecting data from patient monitoring device clinical alarms and patient characteristics from surgical operations. We descriptively analysed the data and statistically analysed the differences in alarm types between weekdays and weekends, using chi-squared, for a total of eight monitors with 562 patients. The most common operational procedure was caesarean section, of which 149 were performed (15.7%). Statistically significant differences existed in alarm types and procedures between weekdays and weekends. The number of alarms produced was 11.7 per patient. In total, 4698 (71.5%) alarms were technical and 1873 (28.5%) were physiological. The most common physiological alarm type was low pulse oximetry, with a total of 437 (23.3%). Of all the alarms, the number of alarms either acknowledged or silenced was 1234 (18.8%). A notable phenomenon in the study unit was alarm fatigue. Greater customisation of patient monitors for different settings is needed to reduce the number of alarms that do not have clinical significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Juho O. Jämsä & Kimmo H. Uutela & Anna-Maija Tapper & Lasse Lehtonen, 2023. "Clinical Alarms in a Gynaecological Surgical Unit: A Retrospective Data Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4193-:d:1081216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4193/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4193/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4193-:d:1081216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.