IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p2790-d1058000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Specific Exercise Models Are Most Effective on Global Cognition in Patients with Cognitive Impairment? A Network Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Junchao Yang

    (School of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Yunfeng Dong

    (School of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Shuting Yan

    (School of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Longyan Yi

    (China Institute of Sports and Health, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Junqiang Qiu

    (School of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
    Beijing Sports Nutrition Engineering Research Center, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

(1) Introduction: Physical exercise interventions can impart significant cognitive benefits to older adults suffering from cognitive impairment (CI). However, the efficacy of these interventions can vary widely, depending on the type, intensity, duration and frequency of exercise. (2) Aim: To systematically review the efficacy of exercise therapy on global cognition in patients with CI using a network meta-analysis (NMA). (3) Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Sport Discus (EBSCO) and Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on exercise for patients with CI from inception to 7 August 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The NMA was performed using the consistency model. (4) Results: A total of 29 RCTs comprising 2458 CI patients were included. The effects of different types of exercise on patients with CI were ranked as follows: multicomponent exercise (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.36, p = 0.002), short duration (≤45 min) (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.19, p = 0.001), vigorous intensity (SMD = 0.77, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.36, p = 0.011) and high frequency (5–7 times/week) (SMD = 1.28, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.14, p = 0.004). (5) Conclusion: These results suggested that multicomponent, short-duration, high-intensity, and high-frequency exercise may be the most effective type of exercise in improving global cognition in CI patients. However, more RCTs based on direct comparison of the effects of different exercise interventions are needed. (6) NMA registration identifier: CRD42022354978.

Suggested Citation

  • Junchao Yang & Yunfeng Dong & Shuting Yan & Longyan Yi & Junqiang Qiu, 2023. "Which Specific Exercise Models Are Most Effective on Global Cognition in Patients with Cognitive Impairment? A Network Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2790-:d:1058000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2790/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2790/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kheng Siang Ted Ng & Angelia Sia & Maxel K. W. Ng & Crystal T. Y. Tan & Hui Yu Chan & Chay Hoon Tan & Iris Rawtaer & Lei Feng & Rathi Mahendran & Anis Larbi & Ee Heok Kua & Roger C. M. Ho, 2018. "Effects of Horticultural Therapy on Asian Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reo Jones & Robin Tarter & Amy Miner Ross, 2021. "Greenspace Interventions, Stress and Cortisol: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Silu Chen & Wanxing Jiang & Xin Li & Han Gao, 2021. "Effect of Employees’ Perceived Green HRM on Their Workplace Green Behaviors in Oil and Mining Industries: Based on Cognitive-Affective System Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Song Song & Ruoxiang Tu & Yao Lu & Shi Yin & Hankun Lin & Yiqiang Xiao, 2022. "Restorative Effects from Green Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Sujin Park & Eunsoo Kim & Geonwoo Kim & Soojin Kim & Yeji Choi & Domyung Paek, 2022. "What Activities in Forests Are Beneficial for Human Health? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-29, February.
    5. Nooshin Razani & Nancy K. Hills & Doug Thompson & George W. Rutherford, 2020. "The Association of Knowledge, Attitudes and Access with Park Use before and after a Park-Prescription Intervention for Low-Income Families in the U.S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Sin-Ae Park & Su Young Son & A-Young Lee & Hee-Geun Park & Wang-Lok Lee & Choong Hwan Lee, 2020. "Metabolite Profiling Revealed That a Gardening Activity Program Improves Cognitive Ability Correlated with BDNF Levels and Serotonin Metabolism in the Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Ted Kheng Siang Ng & Lei Feng & Johnson Fam & Iris Rawtaer & Alan Prem Kumar & Grishma Rane & Irwin Kee-Mun Cheah & Ratha Mahendran & Yuan Kun Lee & Ene Choo Tan & Lee Gan Goh & Ee Heok Kua & Rathi Ma, 2021. "Mindfulness Awareness Practice (MAP) to Prevent Dementia in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial and Implementation Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Yan Han & Yuehui Liang, 2023. "Scientific Knowledge Map Study of Therapeutic Landscapes and Community Open Spaces: Visual Analysis with CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Nooshin Razani & Dayna Long & Danielle Hessler & George W. Rutherford & Laura M. Gottlieb, 2020. "Screening for Park Access during a Primary Care Social Determinants Screen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-9, April.
    10. Prita Indah Pratiwi & Qiongying Xiang & Katsunori Furuya, 2019. "Physiological and Psychological Effects of Viewing Urban Parks in Different Seasons in Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Ernest Bielinis & Aneta Jaroszewska & Adrian Łukowski & Norimasa Takayama, 2019. "The Effects of a Forest Therapy Programme on Mental Hospital Patients with Affective and Psychotic Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Charlotte Wendelboe-Nelson & Sarah Kelly & Marion Kennedy & John W. Cherrie, 2019. "A Scoping Review Mapping Research on Green Space and Associated Mental Health Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-49, June.
    13. Hui-Ying Chu & Hui-Shan Chan & Mei-Fang Chen, 2021. "Effects of Horticultural Activities on Attitudes toward Aging, Sense of Hope and Hand–Eye Coordination in Older Adults in Residential Care Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-28, June.
    14. Julika Loss & Nicola Brew-Sam & Boris Metz & Helmut Strobl & Alexandra Sauter & Susanne Tittlbach, 2020. "Capacity Building in Community Stakeholder Groups for Increasing Physical Activity: Results of a Qualitative Study in Two German Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Juan Du & Jiali Yin & Xiaomei Chen & Ahmad Hassan & Erkang Fu & Xi Li, 2022. "Electroencephalography (EEG)-Based Neural Emotional Response to Flower Arrangements (FAs) on Normal Elderly (NE) and Cognitively Impaired Elderly (CIE)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-9, March.
    16. Giuseppina Spano & Marina D’Este & Vincenzo Giannico & Giuseppe Carrus & Mario Elia & Raffaele Lafortezza & Angelo Panno & Giovanni Sanesi, 2020. "Are Community Gardening and Horticultural Interventions Beneficial for Psychosocial Well-Being? A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    17. Gert-Jan Vanaken & Marina Danckaerts, 2018. "Impact of Green Space Exposure on Children’s and Adolescents’ Mental Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2790-:d:1058000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.