IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2618-d1053600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Perceptions on the Policy of Electronic Cigarettes as Medical Products on Twitter

Author

Listed:
  • Xubin Lou

    (Goergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Pinxin Liu

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zidian Xie

    (Department of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA)

  • Dongmei Li

    (Department of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA)

Abstract

Starting from 1 October 2021, Australia requires a prescription for purchasing nicotine vaping products. On 29 October 2021, the UK provided a guideline to treat e-cigarettes as medical products. This study aims to understand public perceptions of the prescription policy in Australia and the UK on Twitter. Tweets related to e-cigarettes from 20 September 2021 to 31 December 2021 were collected through Twitter streaming API. We adopted both a human and machine learning model to identify a total of 1795 tweets from the UK and Australia related to the prescription policy. We classified them into pro-policy, anti-policy, and neutral-to-policy groups, and further characterized tweets into different topics. Compared to Australia, the proportion of pro-policy tweets in the UK was significantly higher (19.43% vs. 10.92%, p < 0.001), while the proportion of anti-policy tweets was significantly lower (43.4% vs. 50.09%, p = 0.003). The main topics for different attitudes towards the prescription policy between the two countries showed some significant differences, for example, “help quit smoking” in the UK and “health effect of e-cigarettes” in Australia for the positive attitude, “economic effect” in the UK and “preventing smoking cessation” in Australia for the negative attitude, which reflected different public concerns. The findings might provide valuable guidance for other countries to implement a similar policy in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Xubin Lou & Pinxin Liu & Zidian Xie & Dongmei Li, 2023. "Public Perceptions on the Policy of Electronic Cigarettes as Medical Products on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2618-:d:1053600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2618-:d:1053600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.