IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1559-d1036204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Upper Blepharoplasty Techniques on Headaches, Eyebrow Position, and Electromyographic Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Maria H.J. Hollander

    (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Johannes H. van der Hoeven

    (Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Koen H.M. Verdonschot

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Konstantina Delli

    (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Arjan Vissink

    (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Johan Jansma

    (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Rutger H. Schepers

    (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess changes in headaches, eyebrow height, and electromyographic (EMG) outcomes of the frontalis and orbicularis oculi muscles, after an upper blepharoplasty with or without resecting a strip of orbicularis oculi muscle. In a randomized controlled trial, 54 patients received an upper blepharoplasty involving either only removing skin (group A) or removing skin with an additional strip of orbicularis muscle (group B). Preoperative, and 6 and 12 months postoperative headache complaints were assessed using the HIT-6 scores and eyebrow heights were measured on standardised photographs. Surface EMG measurements, i.e., electrical activity and muscle fatigue, were assessed for the frontalis and orbicularis oculi muscles preoperatively and 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Significantly fewer headaches were reported following a blepharoplasty. The eyebrow height had decreased, but did not differ between groups. Regarding the surface EMG measurements, only group A’s frontalis muscle electrical activity had decreased significantly during maximal contraction 12 months after surgery (80 vs. 39 mV, p = 0.026). Fatigue of both the frontalis and the orbicularis oculi muscles did not change significantly postoperatively compared to baseline. EMG differences between groups were minor and clinically insignificant. The eyebrow height decreased and patients reported less headaches after upper blepharoplasty irrespective of the used technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria H.J. Hollander & Johannes H. van der Hoeven & Koen H.M. Verdonschot & Konstantina Delli & Arjan Vissink & Johan Jansma & Rutger H. Schepers, 2023. "Effects of Upper Blepharoplasty Techniques on Headaches, Eyebrow Position, and Electromyographic Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1559-:d:1036204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1559/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1559/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1559-:d:1036204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.