IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i15p6469-d1204890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Gemma Pearce

    (School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
    Occupational Therapy Department, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia)

  • Joan O’Donnell

    (School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Rebecca Pimentel

    (Occupational Therapy Helping Children, Frenchs Forest, NSW 2086, Australia)

  • Elizabeth Blake

    (Occupational Therapy Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia)

  • Lynette Mackenzie

    (School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

Abstract

Purpose: To gather knowledge about effective return to work interventions for survivors of stroke. Methods: A database search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science using keywords and medical subject headings. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (i) studies published in English since the year 2000; (ii) adult patients aged 18–65 with a primary diagnosis of stroke; (iii) working pre-stroke; and (iv) intervention in which one of the primary outcomes is return to work. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed and the evidence synthesised. Results: Twelve studies were included, of which three were randomised controlled trials, four were retrospective studies, one was a cohort study, one was an explorative longitudinal study, one was a pre-post treatment observation study and two were pilot studies. The employment rate at follow-up ranged from 7% to 75.6%. Overall, there was limited published evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions to promote return to work for this population, and it was unclear if return to pre-stroke work was the goal. Conclusion: A lack of large, controlled trials, variations in follow-up time and the definitions of return to work accounted for the large range of employment rates at follow-up. There is limited published high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions to promote return to work in working-age survivors of stroke.

Suggested Citation

  • Gemma Pearce & Joan O’Donnell & Rebecca Pimentel & Elizabeth Blake & Lynette Mackenzie, 2023. "Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:15:p:6469-:d:1204890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/15/6469/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/15/6469/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:15:p:6469-:d:1204890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.