IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i14p6323-d1189492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the Effects of Bafa Wubu Tai Chi and Traditional He-Style Tai Chi Exercises on Physical Health Risk Factors in Overweight Male College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Yantao Niu

    (Exercise and Sport Sciences Program, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
    Faculty of Physical Education, Jiaozuo Normal College, Jiaozuo 454000, China)

  • Rojapon Buranarugsa

    (Exercise and Sport Sciences Program, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
    Physical Education Program, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Piyathida Kuhirunyaratn

    (Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Bafa Wubu Tai Chi (BW-TC) and traditional He-style Tai Chi (TH-TC) exercises on physical health risk factors in overweight male college students and to compare the effectiveness of the two Tai Chi exercise forms in improving these risk factors. Methods: Eighty-one overweight male university students between the ages of 18 and 23 were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to the BW-TC group, TH-TC group, and control group (CG). The Tai Chi exercise training consisted of 12 weeks, three times a week, for 60 min per session. The CG attended three health lectures and maintained their normal study routine. The outcomes were body composition and blood lipids. Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention and analyzed using one-way ANOVA and mixed-design ANOVA. Results: At baseline, there were no significant differences in demographic characteristics and assessed parameters ( p > 0.05) among the groups. The BW TC and TH TC groups both significantly decreased their body weight (2.69 kg, 2.04 kg, respectively), body mass index (0.90 kg/m 2 , 0.67 kg/m 2 , respectively), body fat percentage (1.46%, 1.10%, respectively), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (8.82 mg/dL, 9.27 mg/dL, respectively), total cholesterol (8.57 mg/dL, 9.34 mg/dL, respectively) and triglycerides (10.14 mg/dL, 10.63 mg/dL, respectively); and increased their muscle mass (−0.56 kg, −1.13 kg, respectively) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (−5.77 mg/dL, −6.37 mg/dL, respectively). Multiple comparisons showed that both Tai Chi groups were significantly better than the CG in improving the evaluated parameters. Conclusions: Two types of Tai Chi interventions were effective in improving body composition and blood lipids in overweight university students, without significant differences between the two.

Suggested Citation

  • Yantao Niu & Rojapon Buranarugsa & Piyathida Kuhirunyaratn, 2023. "Comparing the Effects of Bafa Wubu Tai Chi and Traditional He-Style Tai Chi Exercises on Physical Health Risk Factors in Overweight Male College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:14:p:6323-:d:1189492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/14/6323/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/14/6323/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yonghua Chen & Xi Liu & Ni Yan & Wanru Jia & Yahui Fan & Hong Yan & Lu Ma & Le Ma, 2020. "Higher Academic Stress Was Associated with Increased Risk of Overweight and Obesity among College Students in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natasha Lakaev, 2022. "Refinement of the Lakaev Academic Stress Response Scale (LASRS-2) for Research, Clinical, and Educational Settings Using Rasch Modeling," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:14:p:6323-:d:1189492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.