IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i13p6230-d1180170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commentary: Is Wearable Fitness Technology a Medically Approved Device? Yes and No

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer L. Scheid

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Daemen University, Amherst, NY 14226, USA)

  • Jennifer L. Reed

    (Exercise Physiology and Cardiovascular Health Lab, Division of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4W7, Canada
    School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4W7, Canada
    School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4W7, Canada)

  • Sarah L. West

    (Department of Kinesiology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada
    Department of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada)

Abstract

Wearable technologies, i.e., activity trackers and fitness watches, are extremely popular and have been increasingly integrated into medical research and clinical practice. To assist in optimizing health, wellness, or medical care, these devices require collaboration between researchers, healthcare providers, and wearable technology companies in order to clarify their clinical capabilities and educate consumers on the utilities and limitations of the wide-ranging wearable devices. Interestingly, activity trackers and fitness watches often track both health/wellness and medical information within the same device. In this commentary, we will focus our discussions regarding wearable technology on (1) defining and explaining the technical differences between tracking health, wellness, and medical information; (2) providing examples of health and wellness compared to medical tracking; (3) describing the potential medical benefits of wearable technology and its applications in clinical populations; and (4) elucidating the potential risks of wearable technology. We conclude that while wearable devices are powerful and informative tools, further research is needed to improve its clinical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer L. Scheid & Jennifer L. Reed & Sarah L. West, 2023. "Commentary: Is Wearable Fitness Technology a Medically Approved Device? Yes and No," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-9, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:13:p:6230-:d:1180170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/13/6230/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/13/6230/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:13:p:6230-:d:1180170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.