IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p771-d1021632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Author

Listed:
  • Franciska Kiss

    (Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7632 Pécs, Hungary)

  • Nelli Farkas

    (Institute of Bioanalysis, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary)

  • Gabriella Nagy

    (Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7632 Pécs, Hungary)

  • Tünde Minier

    (Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7632 Pécs, Hungary)

  • Gábor Kumánovics

    (Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7632 Pécs, Hungary)

  • Réka Faludi

    (Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary)

  • László Czirják

    (Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7632 Pécs, Hungary)

  • Cecília Varjú

    (Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7632 Pécs, Hungary)

Abstract

(1) Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by significant fatigue, causing diminished quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to examine fatigue levels and their associations with clinical factors and determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) value for the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-FS). (2) Methods: A total of 160 SSc patients and 62 individuals without SSc were followed-up over a 12-month period by measuring the FACIT-FS and the Visual Analogue Scale and the Short Form 36 Vitality Score analyzing changes in exhaustion. (3) Results: Fatigue was strongly correlated with HRQoL, level of pain, emotional disorders, physical capability and functionality. The MCID values for FACIT-FS were calculated as −3 for deterioration and +4 for improvement after a 12-month follow-up. The predictors of improvement of fatigue from baseline parameters were the significant disease activity, the patients’ poorer functionality and the short disease duration. Patients with scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease at baseline had approximately tripled risks for worsening fatigue. The independent influential factors regarding the changing of FACIT-FS were improving or worsening in the same direction in reference to physical condition, gastrointestinal and emotional factors. (4) Conclusions: Fatigue is a multi-dimensional symptom, which is strongly correlated to HRQoL. MCID values of FACIT-FS can be useful tools in monitoring the changes of HRQoL in clinical trials and in daily practice among patients with SSc.

Suggested Citation

  • Franciska Kiss & Nelli Farkas & Gabriella Nagy & Tünde Minier & Gábor Kumánovics & Réka Faludi & László Czirják & Cecília Varjú, 2022. "Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:771-:d:1021632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:771-:d:1021632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.