IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p65-d1009937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilization of Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Theory to Evaluate Workplace Stress Experienced by Health Care Assistants in a UK In-Patient Dementia Unit after 10 Years of National Financial Austerity (2008–2018)

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Chigozie Udushirinwa

    (Department of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, School of Nursing, Chelmsford Campus, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK)

  • Andrew McVicar

    (Department of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, School of Nursing, Chelmsford Campus, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK)

  • Julie Teatheredge

    (Department of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, School of Nursing, Chelmsford Campus, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK)

Abstract

Aims: Workplace stress for support workers in UK hospitals (Health Care Assistants; HCAs) is poorly understood. This study explores experiences of HCAs working in a National Health Service in-patient dementia unit after 10 years of national financial austerity (2008–2018). Design: Qualitative evaluation. Methods: 15 HCAs (42%) from a specialist dementia care Unit were interviewed. Interviews were guided by UK Health & Safety Executive published dimensions of work stress. Framework analysis was applied to interview transcriptions, corroborated by a follow-up focus group (6 HCAs). Post hoc interviews with 10 nurses were later introduced to obtain a balanced view of teamwork on the Unit. Results: Health care assistants were altruistic regarding demands of dementia care but otherwise negative of most aspects of their work environment. Staff shortages had increased job demands: workload, poor shift rotas, and excessive reliance on inexperienced agency staff. According to HCAs, job resources of the care team were in significant deficit: nurses in charge were perceived as poor team leaders, had poor interpersonal skills, lacked respect for experienced HCAs, and deemed to be frequently absent from the ward so failing to support carers. HCAs’ lack of decision-latitude exacerbated the situation. In contrast, nurses interviewed did not recognise the teamwork issues raised by HCAs, who were considered obstructive, unsupportive, lacked awareness of nurses’ responsibilities, and of insights how understaffing meant excessive administration and time required to support patients’ relatives. Such dissonant inter-group views caused considerable friction and exacerbated the work pressure. Conclusion: Study outcomes spotlighted impacts of socioeconomic issues for HCAs. Staff shortage, exacerbated by financial austerity measures (pre-COVID pandemic), increased job demands for HCAs but their psychosocial job resources were in serious deficit, so putting them at risk of burnout. Inter-group relations are key for a collaborative ethos, and are amenable to interventions. Such difficulties should not be allowed to fester.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Chigozie Udushirinwa & Andrew McVicar & Julie Teatheredge, 2022. "Utilization of Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Theory to Evaluate Workplace Stress Experienced by Health Care Assistants in a UK In-Patient Dementia Unit after 10 Years of National Financial Austerity (2," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:65-:d:1009937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/65/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/65/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jermaine M. Ravalier & Andrew McVicar & Charlotte Boichat, 2020. "Work Stress in NHS Employees: A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:zib:zbmbmj:v:1:y:2022:i:1:p:31-34 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:65-:d:1009937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.