IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p497-d1017999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Sachiko Yashima

    (Division of Radiation, Miyagi Cancer Society, Sendai 980-0011, Miyagi, Japan
    Division of Radiological Disasters and Medical Science, International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS), Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Miyagi, Japan)

  • Koichi Chida

    (Division of Radiological Disasters and Medical Science, International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS), Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Miyagi, Japan
    Department of Radiological Technology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan)

Abstract

Japanese people experienced the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings, the Japan Nuclear Fuel Conversion Co. criticality accident, it was found that many human resources are needed to respond to residents’ concerns about disaster exposure in the event of a radiation disaster. Medical radiologic technologists learn about radiation from the time of their training, and are engaged in routine radiographic work, examination explanations, medical exposure counseling, and radiation protection of staff. By learning about nuclear disasters and counseling, we believe they can address residents’ concerns. In order to identify items needed for training, we examined the perceptions of medical radiologic technologists in the case of different specialties, modalities and radiation doses. In 2016, 5 years after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, we conducted a survey of 57 medical radiologic technologists at two medical facilities with different specialties and work contents to investigate their attitudes toward radiation. 42 participants answered questions regarding sex, age group, presence of children, health effects of radiation exposure, radiation control, generation of X rays by diagnostic X ray equipment, and radiation related units. In a comparison of 38 items other than demographic data, 14 showed no significant differences and 24 showed significant differences. This study found that perceptions of radiation were different among radiology technologists at facilities with different specialties. The survey suggested the possibility of identifying needed training items and providing effective training.

Suggested Citation

  • Sachiko Yashima & Koichi Chida, 2022. "Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:497-:d:1017999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/497/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/497/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aspasia Goula & Athanasios Chatzis & Maria-Aggeliki Stamouli & Martha Kelesi & Evridiki Kaba & Emmanouil Brilakis, 2021. "Assessment of Health Professionals’ Attitudes on Radiation Protection Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:497-:d:1017999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.