IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4889-d795867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to ‘4-Poster’ Tick Control Devices in Suburbia

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Roden-Reynolds

    (Department of Environmental Science and Technology, 1422 Animals Sciences Bldg., University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Cody M. Kent

    (Department of Environmental Science and Technology, 1422 Animals Sciences Bldg., University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Andrew Y. Li

    (Invasive Insect Biocontrol and Behavior Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA)

  • Jennifer M. Mullinax

    (Department of Environmental Science and Technology, 1422 Animals Sciences Bldg., University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

Abstract

Deer are keystone hosts for adult ticks and have enabled the spread of tick distributions. The ‘4-Poster’ deer bait station was developed by the United States Department of Agriculture to control ticks feeding on free-ranging deer. Although effective in certain scenarios, ‘4-Poster’ deer treatment stations require the use of bait to attract deer to one location, which may cause increased deer disease transmission rates and habitat damage. To better understand and manage the impact of baited ‘4-Poster’ stations on deer movements, we captured and GPS-monitored 35 deer as part of an integrated pest management project. Fifteen ‘4-Poster’ stations were deployed among three suburban county parks to control ticks. To quantify the effects of ‘4-Poster’ stations, we calculated deer movement metrics before and after feeders were filled with whole kernel corn, and we gathered information on visitation rates to feeders. Overall, 83.3% of collared deer visited a feeder and revisited approximately every 5 days. After feeders were refilled, collared deer were ~5% closer to feeders and conspecifics than before filling. Males used a higher percentage of available feeders and visited them more throughout the deployment periods. Although these nuanced alterations in behavior may not be strong enough to increase local deer abundance, in light of infectious diseases affecting deer populations and effective ‘4-Poster’ densities, the core range shifts and clustering after refilling bait may be a cause for concern. As such, trade-offs between conflicting management goals should be carefully considered when deploying ‘4-Poster’ stations.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Roden-Reynolds & Cody M. Kent & Andrew Y. Li & Jennifer M. Mullinax, 2022. "White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to ‘4-Poster’ Tick Control Devices in Suburbia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4889-:d:795867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4889/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4889/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4889-:d:795867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.