IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4838-d795189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in Macrozoobenthos Community after Aquatic Plant Restoration in the Northern Venice Lagoon (IT)

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Oselladore

    (Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Brondolo No. 5, 30015 Chioggia, VE, Italy)

  • Valentina Bernarello

    (Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Brondolo No. 5, 30015 Chioggia, VE, Italy)

  • Federica Cacciatore

    (Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Brondolo No. 5, 30015 Chioggia, VE, Italy)

  • Michele Cornello

    (Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Brondolo No. 5, 30015 Chioggia, VE, Italy)

  • Rossella Boscolo Brusà

    (Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Brondolo No. 5, 30015 Chioggia, VE, Italy)

  • Adriano Sfriso

    (Centre for Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Sciences (CEMAS), Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, 30170 Mestre, VE, Italy)

  • Andrea Bonometto

    (Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Brondolo No. 5, 30015 Chioggia, VE, Italy)

Abstract

Responses of the macrozoobenthic community to an ecological restoration activity in the northern Venice lagoon were studied, within the scope of the project LIFE SEagrass RESTOration aimed at recreating aquatic phanerogam meadows largely reduced in recent decades. Transplants were successful in almost all project areas. Macrozoobenthos was sampled in eight stations before (2014) and after (2015, 2016, 2017) transplanting activities. An increase in abundance and fluctuations in richness and univariate ecological indices (Shannon’s, Margalef’s, Pielou’s indices) resulted during the years. Comparing non-vegetated and vegetated samples in 2017, every index except Pielou’s increased in the latter. Multivariate analysis (hierarchical cluster analysis, MDS, PERMDISP, SIMPER) grouped samples by localization rather than years, with differences between stations due to the abundance of common species. In 2017, results were also grouped by the presence or absence of aquatic plants, with differences in the abundance of grazer and filter-feeding species. Results of ecological index M-AMBI depicted conditions from moderate to good ecological status (sensu Dir.2000/60/EC) with similar fluctuations, as presented by univariate indices from 2014 to 2017. Responses of the macrozoobenthic community were more evident when comparing vegetated and non-vegetated samples, with the vegetated areas sustaining communities with greater abundance and diversity than non-vegetated samples, thus demonstrating the supporting function of aquatic plants to benthic communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Oselladore & Valentina Bernarello & Federica Cacciatore & Michele Cornello & Rossella Boscolo Brusà & Adriano Sfriso & Andrea Bonometto, 2022. "Changes in Macrozoobenthos Community after Aquatic Plant Restoration in the Northern Venice Lagoon (IT)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4838-:d:795189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4838-:d:795189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.