IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4747-d793744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Clinical Barriers to Employment for Males with Spinal Cord Injury in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad H. AlWashmi

    (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ahmad Zaheer Qureshi

    (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh 12231, Saudi Arabia)

  • Sami Ullah

    (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh 12231, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saeed Bin Ayaz

    (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Combined Military Hospital Jhelum, Jhelum 49600, Pakistan)

  • Nourah Hamad AlKeaid

    (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh 12231, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hind Miqad Alotaibi

    (Department of Nursing, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh 12231, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Return to work is a challenging aspect of community integration for individuals with disabilities. The reintegration of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) is multifactorial; hence, regional challenges need to be investigated in the context of their clinical attributes and perceptions. A total of 121 male participants above 18 years of age with diagnosis of SCI and living at home were included in this cross-sectional survey. The study was conducted at a tertiary care rehabilitation facility in Saudi Arabia. The most common reported clinical barriers to employment were mobility, bladder incontinence, spasticity, musculoskeletal pain, and neuropathic pain. Bladder incontinence and musculoskeletal pain were the most common perceived clinical barriers for individuals with paraplegia and tetraplegia, respectively. A significant difference was observed for bowel incontinence as a reported barrier ( p = 0.024) among adults less than thirty years of age in comparison with those older than thirty years. Spasticity as a barrier was reported more among patients who were older than thirty years (54.0%) compared to those younger than thirty years of age (37.9%) ( p = 0.077). Twenty-two (23.7%) participants with paraplegia reported transfers as a perceived barrier to employment, which was significant ( p = 0.014), and it was also reported as a significant barrier ( p = 0.001) in individuals with tetraplegia (56%). This study shows that clinical conditions associated with SCI are considered potential barriers to employment by individuals with SCI. In terms of priority, the perceived barriers between individuals with tetraplegia and paraplegia were mostly different. This shows the need to consider relevant secondary health care conditions in goal setting while planning for employment in individuals with SCI.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad H. AlWashmi & Ahmad Zaheer Qureshi & Sami Ullah & Saeed Bin Ayaz & Nourah Hamad AlKeaid & Hind Miqad Alotaibi, 2022. "Perceived Clinical Barriers to Employment for Males with Spinal Cord Injury in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4747-:d:793744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4747/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4747/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:5126 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4747-:d:793744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.