IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4436-d788652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of Clinical Inertia and Type 2 Diabetes: Assessment of Primary Care Physicians and Their Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Nemanja Isajev

    (Centre School of Public Health and Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, dr Subotica 15, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Vesna Bjegovic-Mikanovic

    (Centre School of Public Health and Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, dr Subotica 15, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Zoran Bukumiric

    (Institute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, dr Subotica 15, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • David Vrhovac

    (University Children’s Hospital, Tirsova 10, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nebojsa M. Lalic

    (Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, dr Subotica 13, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

With the growing prevalence and complex pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes, many patients fail to achieve treatment goals despite guidelines and possibilities for treatment individualization. One of the identified root causes of this failure is clinical inertia. We explored this phenomenon, its possible predictors, and groups of patients affected the most, together with offering potential paths for intervention. Our research was a cross-sectional study conducted during 2021 involving 52 physicians and 543 patients of primary healthcare institutions in Belgrade, Serbia. The research instruments were questionnaires based on similar studies, used to collect information related to the factors that contribute to developing clinical inertia originating in both physicians and patients. In 224 patients (41.3%), clinical inertia was identified in patients with poor overall health condition, long diabetes duration, and comorbidities. Studying the changes made to the treatment, most patients (53%) had their treatment adjustment more than a year ago, with 19.3% of patients changing over the previous six months. Moreover, we found significant inertia in the treatment of patients using modern insulin analogues. Referral to secondary healthcare institutions reduced the emergence of inertia. This assessment of primary care physicians and their patients pointed to the high presence of clinical inertia, with an overall health condition, comorbidities, diabetes duration, current treatment, last treatment change, glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting glucose measuring frequency, BMI, patient referral, diet adjustment, and physician education being significant predictors.

Suggested Citation

  • Nemanja Isajev & Vesna Bjegovic-Mikanovic & Zoran Bukumiric & David Vrhovac & Nebojsa M. Lalic, 2022. "Predictors of Clinical Inertia and Type 2 Diabetes: Assessment of Primary Care Physicians and Their Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4436-:d:788652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan D. Hirsch & Nancy Kong & Kevin T. Nguyen & Christine L. Cadiz & Crystal Zhou & Sarah A. Bajorek & Mark Bounthavong & Candis M. Morello, 2021. "Improved Patient-Reported Medication Adherence, Patient Satisfaction, and Glycemic Control in a Collaborative Care Pharmacist-Led Diabetes “Tune-Up” Clinic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-10, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4436-:d:788652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.