IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3368-d770012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of CVD Risk Factors in Secondary Prevention after Ischemic Stroke Using the ICF

Author

Listed:
  • Mateusz Lucki

    (Department of Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, University of Medical Sciences, 60-545 Poznań, Poland)

  • Ewa Chlebuś

    (Department of Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, University of Medical Sciences, 60-545 Poznań, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Wareńczak

    (Department of Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, University of Medical Sciences, 60-545 Poznań, Poland)

  • Przemysław Daroszewski

    (Department of Organization and Management in Healthcare, University of Medical Sciences, 60-545 Poznań, Poland)

  • Przemysław Lisiński

    (Department of Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, University of Medical Sciences, 60-545 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Background: Patients after undergoing ischemic stroke have a high risk of further cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidents. Monitoring risk factors is critical to prevent the recurrence of CVD. Objective: The aim of the study was to determine differences in the incidence of risk factors for CVD in a post-ischemic stroke patient group (SG) compared to the control group, which had not undergone ischemic stroke (CG), and to characterize them using the ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) classification system. Materials and Methods: The incidence of risk factors for recurrent CVD events were retrospectively analyzed in 55 patients in SG and 55 patients in CG. The results were translated into categories from the ICF classification system. Results: Atrial fibrillation ( p = 0.013), carotid artery stenosis > 50% ( p < 0.001), LDL > 71 mg/dL ( p < 0.001), heart rate > 80/min ( p = 0.007), taking NOAC ( p = 0.008) and NSAIDs ( p < 0.001) as well as nicotinism ( p = 0.001) were significantly more common in SG compared to CG. The value of the distribution of the total incidence of CVD risk factors were observed to be higher for SG than for CG. In SG, both for males ( p < 0.001) and females ( p < 0.001) more risk factors for recurrent CVD incidents were observed compared to CG. Conclusions: Patients in SG differ in the occurrence of risk factors for CVD event compared to CG. The use of a single tool, such as the ICF assessment sheet, can be useful in assessing and analyzing risk factors for recurrent CVD events. This may help to reduce the risk of subsequent CVD events in secondary prevention.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateusz Lucki & Ewa Chlebuś & Agnieszka Wareńczak & Przemysław Daroszewski & Przemysław Lisiński, 2022. "Assessment of CVD Risk Factors in Secondary Prevention after Ischemic Stroke Using the ICF," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3368-:d:770012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3368-:d:770012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.