IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3285-d768602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Exposure to Legionella pneumophila during Showering: The Difference between a Classical and a Water Saving Shower System

Author

Listed:
  • Hélène Niculita-Hirzel

    (Department Work, Heath & Environment, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Route de la Corniche 2, CH-1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Audrey S. Vanhove

    (EVS-ISTHME UMR 5600, CNRS, University Jean Monnet of Saint-Etienne, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France)

  • Lara Leclerc

    (Mines Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, University Jean Monnet of Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France)

  • Françoise Girardot

    (EVS-ISTHME UMR 5600, CNRS, University Jean Monnet of Saint-Etienne, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France)

  • Jérémie Pourchez

    (Mines Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, University Jean Monnet of Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France)

  • Séverine Allegra

    (EVS-ISTHME UMR 5600, CNRS, University Jean Monnet of Saint-Etienne, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France)

Abstract

The increase in legionellosis incidence in the general population in recent years calls for a better characterization of the sources of infection, such as showering. Water-efficient shower systems that use water-atomizing technology have been shown to emit slightly more inhalable particles in the range of bacterial sizes than the traditional systems; however, the actual rate of bacterial emission remains poorly documented. The aim of this study was to assess the aerosolisation rate of the opportunistic water pathogen Legionella pneumophila during showering with one shower system representative of each technology. To achieve this objective, we performed controlled experiments inside a glove box and determined the emitted dose and viability of airborne Legionella . The bioaerosols were sampled with a Coriolis ® Delta air sampler and the total number of viable (cultivable and noncultivable) Legionella was determined by flow cytometry and culture. We found that the rate of viable and cultivable Legionella aerosolized from the water jet was similar between the two showerheads: the viable fraction represents 0.02% of the overall bacteria present in water, while the cultivable fraction corresponds to only 0.0005%. The two showerhead models emitted a similar ratio of airborne Legionella viable and cultivable per volume of water used. Therefore, the risk of exposure to Legionella is not expected to increase significantly with the new generation of water-efficient showerheads.

Suggested Citation

  • Hélène Niculita-Hirzel & Audrey S. Vanhove & Lara Leclerc & Françoise Girardot & Jérémie Pourchez & Séverine Allegra, 2022. "Risk Exposure to Legionella pneumophila during Showering: The Difference between a Classical and a Water Saving Shower System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3285-:d:768602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3285/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3285/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3285-:d:768602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.