IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2333-d752242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The We Can Quit2 Smoking Cessation Trial: Knowledge Exchange and Dissemination Following a Community-Based Participatory Research Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Castello

    (Public Health & Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin, D24DH74 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Catherine Darker

    (Public Health & Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin, D24DH74 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Joanne Vance

    (Community Programmes, Irish Cancer Society, D04VX65 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Nadine Dougall

    (School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK)

  • Linda Bauld

    (Usher Institute and SPECTRUM Consortium, College of Medicine and Veterinary Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK)

  • Catherine B. Hayes

    (Public Health & Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin, D24DH74 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

Background: ‘We Can Quit2’ pilot randomised controlled trial determined the feasibility [of conducting a community-based trial of We Can Quit, a peer-delivered stop-smoking programme (group support, combination nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and tailored individual support) for women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in Ireland. Lessons from a knowledge exchange (KE) workshop that reengaged trial stakeholders are presented. Methods: The trial dissemination plan included invitation of community, regional and national stakeholders ( n = 176) to a KE interactive workshop, who received an accessible brief beforehand. Trial findings were presented. Enhancements to community engagement, participants’ recruitment and retention, and policy priorities arising from the research were discussed. Field notes and responses to a post-event anonymous questionnaire were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: Workshop attendees (41/176, 23%) recommended: dedicated additional time to engage community stakeholders; social prescribing pathways to enhance recruitment; more adaptation of trial-related information and assistance in completion of data forms for low literacy individuals; encouraging women to join healthy community programmes to facilitate retention and sustainability; removal of barriers to access NRT; and ongoing provision of cessation services tailored to disadvantaged groups. Conclusions: The findings are relevant to the implementation of other community-based health interventions for disadvantaged groups, to policy makers and to service providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Castello & Catherine Darker & Joanne Vance & Nadine Dougall & Linda Bauld & Catherine B. Hayes, 2022. "The We Can Quit2 Smoking Cessation Trial: Knowledge Exchange and Dissemination Following a Community-Based Participatory Research Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2333-:d:752242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2333/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2333/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daisuke Kato & Yuki Kataoka & Erfen Gustiawan Suwangto & Makoto Kaneko & Hideki Wakabayashi & Daisuke Son & Ichiro Kawachi, 2020. "Reporting Guidelines for Community-Based Participatory Research Did Not Improve the Reporting Quality of Published Studies: A Systematic Review of Studies on Smoking Cessation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-9, May.
    2. B. Matthews & Frank Baker & Rachel Spillers, 2003. "How True Is True? Assessing Socially Desirable Response Bias," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 327-335, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dalton Conley & Brian J. McCabe, 2011. "Body Mass Index and Physical Attractiveness: Evidence From a Combination Image-Alteration/List Experiment," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(1), pages 6-31, February.
    2. Ching-Wen Chen, 2012. "Modeling and initiating knowledge management program using FQFD: a case study involving a healthcare institute," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 889-915, April.
    3. Jorun E Thoma & Marion A Waite, 2018. "Experiences of nurse case managers within a central discharge planning role of collaboration between physicians, patients and other healthcare professionals: A sociocultural qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1198-1208, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2333-:d:752242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.