IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1068-d727939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning Curve for Metastatic Liver Tumor Open Resection in Patients with Primary Colorectal Cancer: Use of the Cumulative Sum Method

Author

Listed:
  • Bartlomiej Banas

    (First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Kraków, Poland)

  • Piotr Gwizdak

    (First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Kraków, Poland)

  • Paulina Zabielska

    (Sub-Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Piotr Kolodziejczyk

    (First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Kraków, Poland)

  • Piotr Richter

    (First Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Background: Liver resections have become the first-line treatment for primary and metastatic tumors and, therefore, are considered a core aspect of surgical training. This study aims to evaluate the learning curve of the extent and safety of liver resection procedures for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: This single tertiary center retrospective analysis includes 158 consecutive cases of small liver resection (SLR) (n = 107) and major liver resection (MLR) (n = 58) procedures. A cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) method was used to investigate the learning curve. Results: The operative time, total blood loss level, and incidence of adverse effects showed a learning curve. For SLRs, the CUSUM curve for operative time and blood loss level peaked at the 19th and 17th case, respectively, while for MLRs, these curves peaked at the 28th and 24th case, respectively. The CUSUM curve for minor adverse effects (MAEs) and severe adverse effects (SAEs) showed a downward slope after the 16th and 68th procedures in the SLRs group and after the 29th and 39th procedures in the MLRs cohort; however, it remained within the acceptable range throughout the entire study. Conclusion: SLR procedures were performed faster with less intraoperative blood loss and shorter postoperative stays than MLRs, and a higher number of completed procedures was required to gain stabilization and repeatability in the operating time and intraoperative blood loss level. In MLR procedures, the reduction of SAEs was accomplished significantly later than the stabilization of the operative time and intraoperative blood loss level.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartlomiej Banas & Piotr Gwizdak & Paulina Zabielska & Piotr Kolodziejczyk & Piotr Richter, 2022. "Learning Curve for Metastatic Liver Tumor Open Resection in Patients with Primary Colorectal Cancer: Use of the Cumulative Sum Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1068-:d:727939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1068/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1068/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bartlomiej Banas & Piotr Kolodziejczyk & Aleksandra Czerw & Tomasz Banas & Artur Kotwas & Piotr Richter, 2022. "A Retrospective, Single-Centre Study on the Learning Curve for Liver Tumor Open Resection in Patients with Hepatocellular Cancers and Intrahepatic Cholagangiocarcinomas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-8, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1068-:d:727939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.