IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16723-d1001884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Presents Where? A Population-Based Analysis of Socio-Demographic Inequalities in Head and Neck Cancer Patients’ Referral Routes

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Deane

    (Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 4LP, UK)

  • Ruth Norris

    (Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 4LP, UK)

  • James O’Hara

    (Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 4LP, UK
    Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE7 7DN, UK)

  • Joanne Patterson

    (School of Health Sciences, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZX, UK)

  • Linda Sharp

    (Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 4LP, UK)

Abstract

Head and neck cancers (HNC) are often late stage at diagnosis; stage is a major determinant of prognosis. The urgent cancer referral pathway (two week wait; 2WW) within England’s National Health Service aims to reduce time to diagnosis. We investigated factors associated with HNC route to diagnosis. Data were obtained from the English population-based cancer registry on 66,411 primary invasive HNCs (ICD C01-14 and C31-32) diagnosed 2006–2014. Multivariable logistic regression determined the likelihood of different diagnosis routes by patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics. Significant socio-demographic inequalities were observed. Emergency presentations declined over time and 2WW increased. Significant socio-demographic inequalities were observed. Non-white patients, aged over 65, residing in urban areas with advanced disease, were more likely to have emergency presentations. White males aged 55 and older with an oropharynx cancer were more likely to be diagnosed via 2WW. Higher levels of deprivation were associated with both emergency and 2WW routes. Dental referral was more likely in women, with oral cancers and lower stage disease. Despite the decline over time in emergency presentation and the increased use of 2WW, socio-demographic variation is evident in routes to diagnosis. Further work exploring the reasons for these inequalities, and the consequences for patients’ care and outcomes, is urgently required.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Deane & Ruth Norris & James O’Hara & Joanne Patterson & Linda Sharp, 2022. "Who Presents Where? A Population-Based Analysis of Socio-Demographic Inequalities in Head and Neck Cancer Patients’ Referral Routes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16723-:d:1001884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16723/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16723/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16723-:d:1001884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.