IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15834-d986480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Regeneration Involving Communication between University Students and Residents: A Case Study on the Student Village Design Project

Author

Listed:
  • Joo Young Kim

    (Department of Architecture, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

  • Jung Hoon Kim

    (Smart City Research Center, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si 10223, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study analyzed the effect of the application method of community planning in the case of the Student Village Design Project. Urban regeneration is a method that develops a city with the direct involvement of residents. However, in Korea, urban renewal projects are focused on external expansion, thereby generating conflicts among residents and prolonging these projects. In particular, university towns are experiencing various types of conflicts compared with other urban regeneration projects because the lives of residents and university students are overlapped. Therefore, the research method is conducted as follows to analyze the communication effect in accordance with the purpose of the study. First, we reviewed community planning methods as led by university students. Second, we applied community planning to the project. Third, the results and effects of resident communication were analyzed after applying community planning. Fourth, in the student-led urban regeneration, a community planning method that has results and effects in resident communication was derived. We found that community planning is a significant means of communication between university students and residents. The concrete finding was derived from necessary and optional methods that have high communication effects with residents among the community planning methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Joo Young Kim & Jung Hoon Kim, 2022. "Urban Regeneration Involving Communication between University Students and Residents: A Case Study on the Student Village Design Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15834-:d:986480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15834/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15834/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eunae Jin & Woojong Lee & Danya Kim, 2018. "Does Resident Participation in an Urban Regeneration Project Improve Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Case Study of “Amichojang” in Busan, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Lorna Dargan, 2009. "Participation and Local Urban Regeneration: The Case of the New Deal for Communities (NDC) in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 305-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donghyun Kim & Sanghoon Lee & Seiyong Kim, 2023. "Study of Campustown Projects for the Sustainable Win-Win Growth of Universities and Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Jialing Yan & Yan Huang & Shuying Tan & Wei Lang & Tingting Chen, 2023. "Jointly Creating Sustainable Rural Communities through Participatory Planning: A Case Study of Fengqing County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eunae Jin & Woojong Lee & Danya Kim, 2018. "Does Resident Participation in an Urban Regeneration Project Improve Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Case Study of “Amichojang” in Busan, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Marie-Hélène Bacqué & Carole Biewener, 2013. "Different Manifestations of the Concept of Empowerment: The Politics of Urban Renewal in the United States and the United Kingdom," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2198-2213, November.
    3. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2018. "From Culture 1.0 to Culture 3.0: Three Socio-Technical Regimes of Social and Economic Value Creation through Culture, and Their Impact on European Cohesion Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Kaijian Li & Ruopeng Huang & Guiwen Liu & Asheem Shrestha & Xinyue Fu, 2022. "Social Capital in Neighbourhood Renewal: A Holistic and State of the Art Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Vida Maliene & Natalie Durney-Knight & Begum Sertyesilisik & Naglis Malys, 2012. "Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Sustainable Communities in the North West of England," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Benoit Faye & Éric Le Fur, 2012. "Square, Plaza, Piazza, Place: What Do We Know about these Targets of Urban Regeneration Programmes?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3081-3099, November.
    7. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Venda Louise Pollock & Joanne Sharp, 2012. "Real Participation or the Tyranny of Participatory Practice? Public Art and Community Involvement in the Regeneration of the Raploch, Scotland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3063-3079, November.
    9. Doil Kim & Kabsung Kim, 2022. "Financial Support for Neighborhood Regeneration: A Case Study of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Yasminah Beebeejaun & Lucy Grimshaw, 2011. "Is the ‘New Deal for Communities’ a New Deal for Equality? Getting Women on Board in Neighbourhood Governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(10), pages 1997-2011, August.
    11. Changsong Oh & Jisoo Sim, 2022. "Effectiveness of Public Partnerships in Non-Urban Regeneration Projects in Korea: Seeing through Place-Keeping Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.
    12. Eun Ji Lee & Sung Jun Park, 2021. "Toward the Biophilic Residential Regeneration for the Green New Deal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Houston, Douglas & Zuñiga, Michelle E., 2021. "Perceptions of neighborhood change in a Latinx transit corridor," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Qingchang He & Andras Reith, 2022. "(Re)Defining Restorative and Regenerative Urban Design and Their Relation to UNSDGs—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    15. Sreenidhi Konduri & In-Hee Lee, 2023. "Rethinking Sense of Place Interpretations in Declining Neighborhoods: The Case of Ami-dong Tombstone Cultural Village, Busan, South Korea," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15834-:d:986480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.