IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15635-d983184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part II): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of Dental Pulp and Apical-Neuro-Vascular Bundle in Intact and Reduced Periodontium

Author

Listed:
  • Radu Andrei Moga

    (Department of Cariology, Endodontics and Oral Pathology, School of Dental Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Str. Motilor 33, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Stefan Marius Buru

    (Department of Structural Mechanics, School of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Str. Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Cristian Doru Olteanu

    (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj-Napoca, Str. Avram Iancu 31, 400083 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to biomechanically assess the behavior of apical neuro-vascular bundles (NVB) and dental pulp employing Tresca, Von Mises, Pressure, S1 and S3 failure criterions in a gradual periodontal breakdown under orthodontic movements. Additionally, it was to assess the accuracy of failure criteria, correlation with the maximum hydrostatic pressure (MHP), and the amount of force safe for reduced periodontium. Based on cone-beam computed tomography, 81 3D models of the second lower premolar were subjected to 0.5 N of intrusion, extrusion, rotation, tipping, and translation. A Finite Elements Analysis (FEA) was performed. In intact and reduced periodontium apical NVB, stress (predominant in all criteria) was significantly higher than dental pulp stress, but lower than MHP. VM and Tresca displayed identical results, with added pulpal stress in translation and rotation. S1, S3 and Pressure showed stress in the apical NVB area. 0.5 N seems safe up to 8 mm periodontal breakdown. A clear difference between failure criteria for dental pulp and apical NVB cannot be proved based only on the correlation quantitative results-MHP. Tresca and VM (adequate for ductile materials) showed equivalent results with the lowest amounts of stress. The employed failure criteria must be selected based on the type of material to be analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Radu Andrei Moga & Stefan Marius Buru & Cristian Doru Olteanu, 2022. "Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part II): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of Dental Pulp and Apical-Neuro-Vascular Bundle in Intact and Reduced Periodontium," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15635-:d:983184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15635/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15635/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianlei Wu & Yunfeng Liu & Dongcai Wang & Jianxing Zhang & Xingtao Dong & Xianfeng Jiang & Xu Xu, 2019. "Investigation of effective intrusion and extrusion force for maxillary canine using finite element analysis," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(16), pages 1294-1302, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radu Andrei Moga & Cristian Doru Olteanu & Botez Mircea Daniel & Stefan Marius Buru, 2023. "Finite Elements Analysis of Tooth—A Comparative Analysis of Multiple Failure Criteria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radu Andrei Moga & Stefan Marius Buru & Cristian Doru Olteanu, 2022. "Assessment of the Best FEA Failure Criteria (Part I): Investigation of the Biomechanical Behavior of PDL in Intact and Reduced Periodontium," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Radu Andrei Moga & Cristian Doru Olteanu & Mircea Botez & Stefan Marius Buru, 2023. "Assessment of the Maximum Amount of Orthodontic Force for PDL in Intact and Reduced Periodontium (Part I)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Radu Andrei Moga & Cristian Doru Olteanu & Mircea Botez & Stefan Marius Buru, 2023. "Assessment of the Maximum Amount of Orthodontic Force for Dental Pulp and Apical Neuro-Vascular Bundle in Intact and Reduced Periodontium on Bicuspids (Part II)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Radu Andrei Moga & Cristian Doru Olteanu & Botez Mircea Daniel & Stefan Marius Buru, 2023. "Finite Elements Analysis of Tooth—A Comparative Analysis of Multiple Failure Criteria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-25, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15635-:d:983184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.