IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15602-d982662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repeat Transvenous Lead Extraction—Predictors, Effectiveness, Complications and Long-Term Prognostic Significance

Author

Listed:
  • Andrzej Kutarski

    (Department of Cardiology, Medical University, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

  • Wojciech Jacheć

    (2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Katowice, Poland)

  • Dorota Nowosielecka

    (Department of Cardiology, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamość, Poland
    Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamość, Poland)

  • Marek Czajkowski

    (Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

  • Łukasz Tułecki

    (Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamość, Poland)

  • Anna Polewczyk

    (Institute of Medical Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-369 Kielce, Poland
    Department of Cardiac Surgery, Świętokrzyskie Center of Cardiology, 25-736 Kielce, Poland)

Abstract

Background: Data regarding repeat transvenous lead extraction (TLE) are scarce. The aim of study was to explore the frequency of repeat TLE, its safety, predisposing factors, as well as effectiveness of repeat procedures. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a large single-center database of 3654 TLEs. Results: Repeat TLE was a rare occurrence (193, i.e., 5,28% among 3654 TLEs). Subsequent re-extractions occurred in 12.21% of the patients. Lead failure was the most common cause of re-extraction (51.16%). Cox regression analysis showed that patients who were older at first implantation [HR = 0.987; p = 0.003], had infection-related TLE [HR = 0.392; p < 0.001] and complete procedural success [HR = 0.544; p = 0.034] were less likely to undergo repeat TLE. Functional leads left in place for continuous use [HR = 1.405; p = 0.012] or superfluous leads left in place (abandoned) [HR = 2.370; p = 0.011] were associated with an increased risk of undergoing a repeat procedure. Overall mortality in patients with repeat TLE and subsequent re-extraction in the entire FU period was similar to that in patients without a history of re-extraction [HR = 0.949; p = 0.480]. Conclusions: Repeat TLE was a rare occurrence (5.28%) among TLEs. Left of both active and nonactive leads during TLE increased the risk of re-extraction. Re-extraction has no effect on the long-term mortality.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrzej Kutarski & Wojciech Jacheć & Dorota Nowosielecka & Marek Czajkowski & Łukasz Tułecki & Anna Polewczyk, 2022. "Repeat Transvenous Lead Extraction—Predictors, Effectiveness, Complications and Long-Term Prognostic Significance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15602-:d:982662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15602/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15602/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Łukasz Tułecki & Anna Polewczyk & Wojciech Jacheć & Dorota Nowosielecka & Konrad Tomków & Paweł Stefańczyk & Jarosław Kosior & Krzysztof Duda & Maciej Polewczyk & Andrzej Kutarski, 2021. "Analysis of Risk Factors for Major Complications of 1500 Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures with Especial Attention to Tricuspid Valve Damage," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Marek Czajkowski & Wojciech Jacheć & Anna Polewczyk & Jarosław Kosior & Dorota Nowosielecka & Łukasz Tułecki & Paweł Stefańczyk & Andrzej Kutarski, 2021. "The Influence of Lead-Related Venous Obstruction on the Complexity and Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Łukasz Tułecki & Anna Polewczyk & Wojciech Jacheć & Dorota Nowosielecka & Konrad Tomków & Paweł Stefańczyk & Jarosław Kosior & Krzysztof Duda & Maciej Polewczyk & Andrzej Kutarski, 2021. "A Study of Major and Minor Complications of 1500 Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures Performed with Optimal Safety at Two High-Volume Referral Centers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paweł Stefańczyk & Dorota Nowosielecka & Anna Polewczyk & Wojciech Jacheć & Andrzej Głowniak & Jarosław Kosior & Andrzej Kutarski, 2022. "Efficacy and Safety of Transvenous Lead Extraction at the Time of Upgrade from Pacemakers to Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Paul-Mihai Boarescu & Iulia Diana Popa & Cătălin Aurelian Trifan & Adela Nicoleta Roşian & Ştefan Horia Roşian, 2022. "Practical Approaches to Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures—Clinical Case Series," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Anna Polewczyk & Wojciech Jacheć & Dorota Nowosielecka & Andrzej Tomaszewski & Wojciech Brzozowski & Dorota Szczęśniak-Stańczyk & Krzysztof Duda & Andrzej Kutarski, 2022. "Tricuspid Valve Damage Related to Transvenous Lead Extraction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Paweł Stefańczyk & Dorota Nowosielecka & Anna Polewczyk & Łukasz Tułecki & Konrad Tomków & Wojciech Jacheć & Ewa Lewicka & Andrzej Tomaszewski & Andrzej Kutarski, 2022. "Safety and Effectiveness of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Infected Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Is It More Risky than Extraction of Other Systems?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15602-:d:982662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.