IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p14767-d968325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterising Psycho-Physiological Responses and Relationships during a Military Field Training Exercise

Author

Listed:
  • Sean Bulmer

    (Deakin University, Centre for Sport Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Sean L. Corrigan

    (Deakin University, Centre for Sport Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Jace R. Drain

    (Defence Science and Technology Group, Fisherman’s Bend, Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia)

  • Jamie L. Tait

    (Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Brad Aisbett

    (Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Spencer Roberts

    (Deakin University, Centre for Sport Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Paul B. Gastin

    (La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia)

  • Luana C. Main

    (Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

Abstract

Over a 15-day period, that included an eight-day field trial, the aims of this study were to (1) quantify the physical workload, sleep and subjective well-being of soldiers in training; (2a) Explore relationships between workload and well-being, and (2b) sleep and well-being; (3) Explore relationships between workload, sleep, and well-being. Methods: Sixty-two Combat Engineer trainees (59 male, 3 female; age: 25.2 ± 7.2 years) wore an ActiGraph GT9X to monitor daily energy expenditure, physical activity, and sleep. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE), sleep quality, and fatigue were measured daily, subjective well-being was reported days 1, 5, 9, 13 and 15. Multi-level models were used for the analysis. Results: Well-being was affected by a combination of variables including workload, subjective sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleep efficiency. RPE and subjective sleep quality were consistently significant parameters within the models of best fit. Conclusions: Perceptions of well-being were lower during the field training when physical workload increased, and sleep decreased. Energy expenditure was comparatively low, while daily sleep duration was consistent with field training literature. Subjective assessments of workload and sleep quality were consistently effective in explaining variations in well-being and represent an efficient approach to monitor training status of personnel.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean Bulmer & Sean L. Corrigan & Jace R. Drain & Jamie L. Tait & Brad Aisbett & Spencer Roberts & Paul B. Gastin & Luana C. Main, 2022. "Characterising Psycho-Physiological Responses and Relationships during a Military Field Training Exercise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14767-:d:968325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sean Bulmer & Jace R. Drain & Jamie L. Tait & Sean L. Corrigan & Paul B. Gastin & Brad Aisbett & Timo Rantalainen & Luana C. Main, 2022. "Quantification of Recruit Training Demands and Subjective Wellbeing during Basic Military Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-10, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14767-:d:968325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.