IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13719-d950192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Early vs. Late Gestational Diabetes: Comparison between Two Groups Diagnosed by Abnormal Initial Fasting Plasma Glucose or Mid-Pregnancy Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Assuncao Zaccara

    (Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil)

  • Cristiane Freitas Paganoti

    (Divisao de Clinica Obstetrica do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil)

  • Fernanda C. Ferreira Mikami

    (Divisao de Clinica Obstetrica do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil)

  • Rossana P. Vieira Francisco

    (Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil)

  • Rafaela Alkmin Costa

    (Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil)

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common complications in pregnancy. It may be diagnosed using a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) early in pregnancy (eGDM) or a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (late GDM). This retrospective cohort of women with GDM presents data from 1891 patients (1004 in the eGDM and 887 in the late GDM group). Student’s t-test, chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test and the Bonferroni test for post hoc analysis were used to compare the groups. Women with eGDM had higher pre-pregnancy BMI, more frequent family history of DM, more frequent history of previous GDM, and were more likely to have chronic hypertension. They were more likely to deliver by cesarean section and to present an abnormal puerperal OGTT. Even though they received earlier treatment and required insulin more frequently, there was no difference in neonatal outcomes. Diagnosing and treating GDM is necessary to reduce complications and adverse outcomes, but it is still a challenge. We believe that women with eGDM should be treated and closely monitored, even though this may increase healthcare-related costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Assuncao Zaccara & Cristiane Freitas Paganoti & Fernanda C. Ferreira Mikami & Rossana P. Vieira Francisco & Rafaela Alkmin Costa, 2022. "Early vs. Late Gestational Diabetes: Comparison between Two Groups Diagnosed by Abnormal Initial Fasting Plasma Glucose or Mid-Pregnancy Oral Glucose Tolerance Test," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13719-:d:950192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13719-:d:950192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.