IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13692-d949576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feelings of Polish and Palestinian Students after Receiving Vaccinations against COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Zdziarski

    (Subdepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Karakiewicz-Krawczyk

    (Department of Specialist Nursing, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Mariam S. Awad

    (Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Bethlehem University, Bethlehem 92248, Palestine)

  • Narmeen Qumsieh

    (Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Bethlehem University, Bethlehem 92248, Palestine)

  • Anna Landowska

    (Faculty of Economics, Finance and Management, University of Szczecin, 71-101 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Beata Karakiewicz

    (Subdepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has limited human freedom in many areas. Developing a COVID-19 vaccine has been a key task to contain the spread of the virus. In many countries, there is increasing concern about anti-vaccines due to complications after receiving the vaccine. The research problem concerns the opinions of Polish and Palestinian students after receiving vaccinations against COVID-19. This study involved 657 respondents (332 from Poland and 325 from Palestine) who completed the original questionnaire online. The respondents present two different cultures, embedded in different existential conditions, also in terms of health care, and especially the availability of vaccines. The obtained data indicate that almost 50% of research participants from both countries believe that vaccines are an effective antidote to the pandemic situation. Respondents in both populations believed that it was their personal choice to undergo vaccinations. The social motivation for vaccination in both groups was the desire to participate in public life, and the possibility of free travel for Poles, and the fear of infecting other people for Palestinians. The most common side effect reported after vaccination was pain at the site of the infection. Medical assistance was more often sought by respondents from Palestine. From an existential, psychosocial and health perspective, vaccines contributed to strengthening the vital forces in a large part of the population, allowed rebuilding social interactions and gave a sense of security in the daily functioning of a person.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Zdziarski & Katarzyna Karakiewicz-Krawczyk & Mariam S. Awad & Narmeen Qumsieh & Anna Landowska & Beata Karakiewicz, 2022. "Feelings of Polish and Palestinian Students after Receiving Vaccinations against COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13692-:d:949576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13692/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13692/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yara Dahdal & Nadav Davidovitch & Michael Gilmont & Javier Lezaun & Maya Negev & Deborah Sandler & Mohammed Shaheen, 2021. "Lessons of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict for Public Health: The Case of the COVID-19 Vaccination Gap," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-7, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huojin Chen & Jian-Hong Ye, 2023. "The Influence of Outdoor Activities and Campus Landscape on University Students’ Subjective Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13692-:d:949576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.