IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12302-d927438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Dry Needling Treatment on Tibial Musculature in Combination with Neurorehabilitation Treatment in Stroke Patients: Randomized Clinical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Zacarías Sánchez Milá

    (Area of Physiotherapy, Catholic University of Ávila, 05005 Ávila, Spain)

  • Jorge Velázquez Saornil

    (Area of Physiotherapy, Catholic University of Ávila, 05005 Ávila, Spain)

  • Angélica Campón Chekroun

    (Area of Physiotherapy, Catholic University of Ávila, 05005 Ávila, Spain)

  • José Manuel Barragán Casas

    (Area of Physiotherapy, Catholic University of Ávila, 05005 Ávila, Spain)

  • Raúl Frutos Llanes

    (Area of Physiotherapy, Catholic University of Ávila, 05005 Ávila, Spain)

  • Arantxa Castrillo Calvillo

    (Centro Lescer, 28050 Madrid, Spain)

  • Cristina López Pascua

    (Centro Lescer, 28050 Madrid, Spain)

  • David Rodríguez Sanz

    (Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

(1) Background: Introducing ultrasound-guided dry needling to neurorehabilitation treatments increases the beneficial effects of therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of including an ultrasound-guided dry needling session in neurorehabilitation treatment on spasticity and gait–balance quality versus neurorehabilitation treatment in subjects who had suffered a stroke. (2) Methods: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Thirty-six patients who had suffered a stroke in the right middle cerebral artery signed the informed consent for participation in the study. Twenty patients finally participated and were randomly assigned to the control group (neurorehabilitation treatment) or experimental group (neurorehabilitation treatment plus ultrasound-guided dry needling). Pre-treatment and post-treatment data were collected on the same day. The experimental group (n = 10) first underwent an ultrasound-guided dry needling intervention on the tibialis anterior and tibialis posterior musculature, followed by neurorehabilitation treatment; the control group (n = 10) underwent their corresponding neurorehabilitation without the invasive technique. Pre-treatment and post-treatment measurements were taken on the same day, assessing the quality of balance–gait using the “Up and Go” test and the degree of spasticity using the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale. (3) Results: The patients who received neurorehabilitation treatment plus ultrasound-guided dry needling showed a greater decrease in spasticity in the tibial musculature after the neurorehabilitation treatment session ( p < 0.001), improving balance and gait ( p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: An ultrasound-guided dry needling session combined with neurorehabilitation treatment reduced spasticity and improved balance and gait in stroke patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Zacarías Sánchez Milá & Jorge Velázquez Saornil & Angélica Campón Chekroun & José Manuel Barragán Casas & Raúl Frutos Llanes & Arantxa Castrillo Calvillo & Cristina López Pascua & David Rodríguez Sanz, 2022. "Effect of Dry Needling Treatment on Tibial Musculature in Combination with Neurorehabilitation Treatment in Stroke Patients: Randomized Clinical Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-9, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12302-:d:927438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12302/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12302/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12302-:d:927438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.